Re: [86attendees] Pie?

"Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jhildebr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C645111E81FF for <86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QxOG5luOhoDH for <86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDF411E81AB for <86attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=315; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363272984; x=1364482584; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=gBTbLGB9t/cv1xYDLhe5M1N2y0GtZsDT7O83qsXq0T0=; b=Q6JVGyLfr3mYABfpC/LMJgIiJ79oyqbZkzWOGy5pT5IOipVbo5y7toms nNJvdBFZhV6nM70hDmlA3/1R6eWPalLTYr2p79tgivRHHYps6QzIRW/mr 35ks/TJiR03SrBOGmBJb4q/oXQISNmNkITYRw051OW6Ivq3si9hCvX8AN k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisFAFnkQVGtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABEDodVvRWBYhZ0giwBBDo/EgEIIhRCJQIEAQ0FCIgMDMEmjl8xB4JfYQOXd49jgks/gig
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,845,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="187464054"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2013 14:56:24 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2EEuO0e009405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:56:24 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.195]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:56:24 -0500
From: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>, Tim Shepard <shep@alum.mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [86attendees] Pie?
Thread-Index: AQHOIL9PM1FW7M2STT+LvAJ4aBuXJ5illLkA///CuYA=
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:56:23 +0000
Message-ID: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F8D66D0@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130314143540.GA16749@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.1.130117
x-originating-ip: [10.21.150.178]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <BC9AE5F09EF4ED40875E0219E617C468@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org>, Andrew Mcgregor <andrewmcgr@google.com>, Jon Hudson <jon.hudson@gmail.com>, Scott Brim <swb@internet2.edu>, "86attendees@ietf.org" <86attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [86attendees] Pie?
X-BeenThere: 86attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <86attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/86attendees>, <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/86attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:86attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/86attendees>, <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:56:29 -0000

On 3/14/13 10:35 AM, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr> wrote:

>I'm not sure it has practical consequences for the IETF. Is there even
>one RFC which uses the number Pi? ("pi" in RFC 2865 is a different
>beast)

e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6716#section-4.2.7.5.6

-- 
Joe Hildebrand