IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [86attendees] Pie?

Stephen Botzko <stephen.botzko@gmail.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1153911E8133 for <86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cNk4JI+yha6B for <86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f50.google.com (mail-pb0-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB7011E81F9 for <86attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id up1so2701357pbc.23 for <86attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=W/rymPrQJiA9RPh7ElpCqzTFeNyAvTw133WA6t6KVag=; b=mBBnoSxnFutsZtLAe2X8Bsd0JENhlfpCNOWHQzB7jNcIwc285x+f56eSN903UjBll9 x9EtPvy7jOe1fmIX+4X5zXCeGzN7eaXt5IJi5SMLTnosr9x/54JxyPFoxUu/+ULe8x2T J1SqyJZSFkyWztrWhztmLeBE/7S0xmsJuOzKI3wdgq6CwXD8Bxx3BfBCbHOg9kpB/xSV lQsU5V52jXawNJW6Jn/6wJLZs9sa0GY43sXZYI6iLrkUIgqXH59anNdUZFnVWPNzWiG4 huDJmUfviJvD5Y8/AATJAp6GutbcMRkUwZThIUD6stVq8A/QehqhwHzXFO2V4V//m1wj QQjg==
X-Received: by 10.68.228.164 with SMTP id sj4mr8657304pbc.180.1363291965141; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df8::16:7004:af34:5f33:5c8e? ([2001:df8:0:16:7004:af34:5f33:5c8e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pg7sm4763740pbc.5.2013.03.14.13.12.43 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20130314200047.63176.qmail@joyce.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <20130314200047.63176.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A52C95E6-C1A4-4606-8224-4F3C959B31F1@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B147)
From: Stephen Botzko <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:12:42 -0400
To: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
Cc: "bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr" <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>, "86attendees@ietf.org" <86attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [86attendees] Pie?
X-BeenThere: 86attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <86attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/86attendees>, <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/86attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:86attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/86attendees>, <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:12:54 -0000

RFC 4910, 5639, and 6114

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:00 PM, "John Levine" <ietf@johnlevine.com> wrote:

>> I'm not sure it has practical consequences for the IETF. Is there even
>> one RFC which uses the number Pi? ("pi" in RFC 2865 is a different
>> beast)
> 
> RFC 3091.  Sheesh.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 86attendees mailing list
> 86attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/86attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email