IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [86attendees] Pie?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr> Thu, 14 March 2013 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: 86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8976811E80EE for <86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PXeIi12iuqZI for <86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAAD11E80F0 for <86attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 05:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 28B833BB49; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:59:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by tyrion (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8ABC4F006CA; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:59:37 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:59:37 -0400
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
To: Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org>
Message-ID: <20130314125937.GA11093@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <824CBBAF26EC8E428BE32C12F75F93690A2B08B4@CH1PRD0810MB395.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CANbjNQEgOMWAcdOgxKcmXCsPUiD1UQhQA1f-V-Nb7CxwguAq9w@mail.gmail.com> <E673827B-2EDF-4A30-808C-8DF0CA5D3330@isoc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E673827B-2EDF-4A30-808C-8DF0CA5D3330@isoc.org>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 12.04 (precise)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "86attendees@ietf.org" <86attendees@ietf.org>, Scott Brim <swb@internet2.edu>, Jon Hudson <jon.hudson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [86attendees] Pie?
X-BeenThere: 86attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <86attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/86attendees>, <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/86attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:86attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/86attendees>, <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:00:00 -0000

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 08:23:14AM -0400,
 Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org> wrote 
 a message of 79 lines which said:

> What with UK date notation, us Brits don't celebrate Pi Day until
> the 3rd of Febcember... (It's an irrational month)

Since it is IETF, we should use only the RFC 3339 format. 

3-14-1592 does not exist. Interesting mathematical fact.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email