IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [91attendees] Social event cost

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Thu, 13 November 2014 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BB41AD935 for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:47:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VH3LMXUjIoYa for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:47:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com (mail-qg0-f46.google.com [209.85.192.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF07A1AD8F9 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:47:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i50so11015758qgf.33 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:47:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gnCSpJjNRFV30VCIWDFsZok3PhQWvqq1ngl6QSF+zF8=; b=DcfVbr+NsLYaxBptMHRJTTUndgyNX8f5k5zmNUBdUroxbmvrBMYlyRjJd7RPSBRsF6 2oEvUTId7nmpDY0AGxsQwZvwry3I4MQX0itHWFfC8PkGrzIAxe2Jx/isCnv6YBB9K5nH 4z76+Pka9ks7fNOO/9z/3MAntslrrAM2ozsOpZDIio00MfpHZB0qCkqLzv3fubPq82Qr tm3w03+XbI8Omf8Sb8WWNAUVJZtX+K+S0eIXdHsKlhXomxeZWlAG2HEvO6p3Ce1Uln65 fKkNp3Kc/F1LUVEepQW+GPKrNhEFUCbZusAfmnGKmFrUk+e1/TrxPqASIl/VxwBJs8Fc KwYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5JK4CTwoFmMAqcyvhfWPlssUCOOmHVUaJBlDJEHOf95OhKsI+kdCm0JeauiZf5qLl7Uc1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.125.66 with SMTP id x2mr6374894qar.78.1415915230040; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:47:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.37.52 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:47:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <546517E8.1090902@rrbone.net>
References: <54648590.7050400@earthlink.net> <1068CD97-B435-4C98-BE35-7BBC72A1CFC2@hawaii.edu> <6EB34CB5D82C4645B826C56144826EA97EA8D8FD@SZXEMA509-MBX.china.huawei.com> <546513D5.6030902@bwijnen.net> <546517E8.1090902@rrbone.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:47:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CABCOCHRkZC9TNuqXk-X3__DM2LysN997Ah=jsWuv3JKhqB8UhQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: Dominik Bay <db@rrbone.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/PVYbtDuygAdJN3UpmL2P1qwGY5E
Cc: 91attendees <91attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [91attendees] Social event cost
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:47:12 -0000

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Dominik Bay <db@rrbone.net> wrote:
> On 11/13/2014 10:25 AM, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
>> This is very decadent.
>> I am often disappointed if I get to the breakfast in the morning and
>> there is no food left.
>> But I prefer that far above trowing away great food!
>> In our western world, we tend to buuy and then trow away far too much food.
>> I think that is irresponsible.
>>
>> Sorry, but I HAVE to say this.
>
> That's why I left the social, it depressed me to see (probably not well
> paid humans) carelessly throwing away the food/leftovers.
> I much prefer buffets allowing for more granular distribution of food
> toward the demand for an evening.

+1 to buffets. (Prefer more beer and less food ;-)

I suspect that local laws prevent the hotel from giving away food
that has already been served.


Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email