Re: [91attendees] Social event cost

Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> Thu, 13 November 2014 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <victor@jvknet.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801981AD36F for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:44:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2oEKn_3ARx1Z for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:44:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7B81AD23D for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id l15so812665wiw.4 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:44:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Oew0WGsqEm69/5Q88PEKDNScL/IfFqn48spBMlnMQSg=; b=EIlzNphxcgG4L1YOVGKvSCpgWkffW2kDitSdMS4JdoNtu62URakKAekDXqA6HUjsFc 4lYuhqQRpphUi1ccPCDa32fTlN85mWUeL8cam3HNwlJv+UF2p6A35Nt7WeiFQJ9qbXGp vEgVh16ZQbbTXoNZFlg33gu9NZ2jWJQ6vK8RRbVixAs3SmzkzndNY0dAm4cY8VlJVL5A a4CPg7t5go0bx2/VjnU4XjwfRA93zWw2lclbuzaP+5ltD5EBf8KFzNscVHCPNPwCdYrU kaKVG5hwFgDN17AfpF1Mj/3zIhhr5fFMHunQ24IUuk/ayVGpIWDHeD5KiAyhxQyf2wNX TUUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQknbkJgWs9qipRgRdOqf1GoOsY8SoZ8Z6PYdWTF53XSqTcvETPOowo4KlylUn0iFPdc5CdO
X-Received: by 10.194.187.229 with SMTP id fv5mr7342105wjc.26.1415911443786; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-a0ea.meeting.ietf.org (t2001067c03700160752ff824b9f6cc1d.wireless.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:160:752f:f824:b9f6:cc1d]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s10sm31175902wjw.29.2014.11.13.12.44.02 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54651812.3070807@jvknet.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:44:02 -1000
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Charlie Perkins <Charlie.Perkins@huawei.com>, "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>, 91attendees <91attendees@ietf.org>
References: <54648590.7050400@earthlink.net> <1068CD97-B435-4C98-BE35-7BBC72A1CFC2@hawaii.edu> <6EB34CB5D82C4645B826C56144826EA97EA8D8FD@SZXEMA509-MBX.china.huawei.com> <546513D5.6030902@bwijnen.net> <AC4B082D9545434B886C501395195A293714B79B@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <AC4B082D9545434B886C501395195A293714B79B@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/bdGqLokH8Ze2iXMeZlHy2ACjtjU
Subject: Re: [91attendees] Social event cost
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:44:13 -0000

On 2014-11-13 10:37 AM, Charlie Perkins wrote:
> +1
>
> ... not just for the waste itself, but also for engendering the attitude that the waste is O.K., and perhaps even a way to show off a luxurious life.
I would agree.  This is especially sad since only two blocks away from 
the hotel I have seen many homeless / hungry people who looked like they 
could have benefited from our excess.

This is not a slight on our gracious hosts and a wonderful event, but 
just a reflection in humanity.

regards,

Victor K


>
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 91attendees [mailto:91attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bert Wijnen (IETF)
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 12:26 PM
> To: Hongyu Li (Julio); Alan Whinery; 91attendees
> Subject: Re: [91attendees] Social event cost
>
> This is very decadent.
> I am often disappointed if I get to the breakfast in the morning and there is no food left.
> But I prefer that far above trowing away great food!
> In our western world, we tend to buuy and then trow away far too much food.
> I think that is irresponsible.
>
> Sorry, but I HAVE to say this.
> Bert
>
> On 13/11/14 20:53, Hongyu Li (Julio) wrote:
>> What I've seen in the social was half of the delicate dishes, which were not finished, were tossed into the trash bin accompanied by
>> the fantastic performance on the stage.
> _______________________________________________
> 91attendees mailing list
> 91attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees
>
> _______________________________________________
> 91attendees mailing list
> 91attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees