IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF network, please ?

Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> Thu, 05 November 2015 04:41 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F00C1A034C for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:41:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.559
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.559 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBtLh3nVUkM6 for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:41:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B45A1A010E for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:41:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id tA54f3Tr023209 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:41:03 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F3CE200C17 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:47:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C70200C0F for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:47:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.84.3]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id tA54exC2028799 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:41:02 +0100
To: 94attendees@ietf.org
References: <20151102055200.GI31730@cisco.com> <7iio5k5kpz.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <5136.1446543935@dooku.sandelman.ca> <563A938E.503@gmail.com> <1446697740188-c19e4b9d-85a556f4-c02a14bb@fugue.com>
From: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <563ADDDA.5050809@cea.fr>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:40:58 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1446697740188-c19e4b9d-85a556f4-c02a14bb@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms060103020305040209050701"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/hajk1vs7QlyFEImaKNeba3n8iA0>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF network, please ?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 04:41:09 -0000

With respect to a potential hackathon - is there a DHCPv6-PD client for 
Windows or should I compile one from isc.org with cygwin?

Alex

Le 05/11/2015 13:28, Ted Lemon a écrit :
> Thursday, Nov 5, 2015 8:23 AM joel jaeggli wrote:
>> we have discussed doing it before, it's mostly a question of having
>> the right pieces in place and tested before hand. we have enough
>> moving parts this time with new routers that it's maybe not the best
>> place to be doing that also.
>>
>> this network with respect to model/deployment looks more like an
>> interprise or campus build and less like an ISP, it also has to
>> contend with (in the case of the hotel net extensions) running on top
>> of third party gear which it doesn't control.
> There might be grist for a hackathon in this question.   I suspect that the needed tools are not all present.
>
>
> --
> Sent from Whiteout Mail - https://whiteout.io
>
> My PGP key: https://keys.whiteout.io/mellon@fugue.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 94attendees mailing list
> 94attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email