Re: [99attendees] ietf-hotel experience

Bryan Call <bcall@apache.org> Mon, 17 July 2017 07:50 UTC

Return-Path: <bcall@apache.org>
X-Original-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEF6131A80 for <99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n125KL4VOKd9 for <99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 05E43131A55 for <99attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 45296 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2017 07:50:15 -0000
Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:50:15 +0000
Received: from dhcp-8336.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8336.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.131.54]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 6ABD61A00E8; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:50:13 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Bryan Call <bcall@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <m2y3rnr1no.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:50:10 +0200
Cc: 99attendees@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <18556EFA-2734-460F-B074-E77E49C63508@apache.org>
References: <m2y3rnr1no.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/99attendees/wbuYUJDcfe1vHk0sct0PoVCvM0M>
Subject: Re: [99attendees] ietf-hotel experience
X-BeenThere: 99attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 99 attendees that have opted in on this list <99attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/99attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:99attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:50:20 -0000

I had a lot of problems using the hotel wifi (lots of packet loss).  I switched over to using the wired connection in my room and using my own wifi router.

-Bryan

> On Jul 17, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
> just in case it is helpful to others:
> 
> this has happened a number of times.  the laptop and i get to our room,
> associate with the ietf-hotel ssid wireless, and things work ok for a
> minute or three before they go to absolute hell.  i turn my wifi (macos)
> off and on again, and things are fine for the rest of the night.
> 
> the conjecture is my turning wifi off and on again gets me a better
> wireless access point.
> 
> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 99attendees mailing list
> 99attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/99attendees