IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [99attendees] ietf-hotel experience

Andrew McGregor <andrewmcgr@gmail.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewmcgr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA39131461 for <99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wy-QGGr3C8lQ for <99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x232.google.com (mail-pg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D2F127599 for <99attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 123so5181298pgj.1 for <99attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=afRmeLbhgMGb6mIFJuQ9s6zFQzmdRFsZmDQcmfZS+ew=; b=qSxOPajTbwZsSLLcALKekMlt2OXKg+Mklz9qBZrFzeDpZWC7KqbcE0zb3z+mI0kz+6 /XWf6Cv9Qhpy+rc4FKXtQG2+DdHYjdE3MgwynyLO0sAibLe0dbcJtKdDGEUFKa79I1ud Ub3WXpOZCmukLdjb1Bb/bo7hIa4IiiXhhsr9T6k53Vs3GS594QcRA/r68F1r5+rTg4xU YoWRZ3ZHiNlqEVQgkX4T3lPp0fhqfC78f/17MXX3D/YHZ7+T2DxKeyHaTWwF7l/8U6uw tC2jq6Z+uokHFZMQo0dN8xc43NHTISA5ppjJE75198XL5enqW5jmG8H8E5hruvL29K6X 69jA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=afRmeLbhgMGb6mIFJuQ9s6zFQzmdRFsZmDQcmfZS+ew=; b=YTpujUyZh2Kb5dyw9NR/kGe4Ts/ntpNF8wreBe12IZX5KNs3SYp4AmGi4HH5yaY7Pk dwsbc6PzMUIkVUSlvBDpvy1pRFitnLvaOC2qeI2wKgCyw+bL/EojazQdkuFwSKjAF2cK CCtLHFEsmPW3lWWxwfGqOUZsNKC2cYsYDgNQa0yWVKrkE7U4VjkUufwg8/Z65rvgEOXQ 6uBI2s8qAj4n023hNoT8tCR2cKpO9cCtHS4Ji9E4rSytLcpJi7gr2f49rNd97AbHjo4p Xjb9v0Fib7QCQwfrLlUUFmyXUnxGhpDHYMH78lRofZZZCnB5jJVcatghB8pix25fUexV f0DQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112oSkDBhJBAL1CC7SIezMoftuUbzfxkqB3PjBuD36DE5C7aGl/E T7boB6VuLSQ0tM7IUFOxZ8KYKj6AtlV+
X-Received: by 10.99.218.81 with SMTP id l17mr27931102pgj.59.1500290488467; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.167.101 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.167.101 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2fudvqw2o.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <m2y3rnr1no.wl-randy@psg.com> <18556EFA-2734-460F-B074-E77E49C63508@apache.org> <AEB55403-55E6-42A4-B7C7-49B1B41DC82D@encrypted.net> <m2fudvqw2o.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Andrew McGregor <andrewmcgr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 21:21:27 +1000
Message-ID: <CAA_e5Z50kayhYcLztKvcc-oUrb31gkNBJrvtgqomjPwjVF8sAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: 99attendees@ietf.org, Bryan Call <bcall@apache.org>, Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114c2e78a006b00554819951"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/99attendees/zTFNA-NsWpEE6bAdE4TJF5nXk00>
Subject: Re: [99attendees] ietf-hotel experience
X-BeenThere: 99attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 99 attendees that have opted in on this list <99attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/99attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:99attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:21:31 -0000

Protocol design is harder; most wifi problems are protocol issues in the
MAC layer not RF issues. Especially hard is security.

On 17 Jul. 2017 10:58 am, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > I find it depends where you're at in the hotel. The last 2 times we
> > were here, I had to bring an airport express with me, because the wifi
> > network sucked my will to live. This time, I'm finding I don't need
> > it, and wifi is fine (I too have a mac). As with those last 2 times,
> > folks in different parts of the hotel had different experiences. It
> > would seem that this time might be no different.
>
> RF design is hard
>
> _______________________________________________
> 99attendees mailing list
> 99attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/99attendees
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email