Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 26 November 2015 03:18 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5461E1A9127 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:18:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1LjCgQVX6R3z for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:18:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com (mail-lf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F051A9123 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:18:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lffu14 with SMTP id u14so82684725lff.1 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:18:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b9NmP8d/6VtBPgzqYtoNsV9tVBA3bRT0X0AoKJ1I1BY=; b=FomQ/DuKr+8Y1IxV4WJTrOivGDpoBGh9i4gRpLRt70zOK9BlyzM6usMwzHtF7i9Kvc ezRCqerU8g+MSNzg7RuxbviBZTVoQwf5uiZ9Ab53hgpA1cTG0UlCAp+2MGDAXaeeFfmy LCGxIIWbDTrqcP1v4U/kR7hP/8zKcUOOYsWFOMSMJQXzpNC39ZF2ZwpiLLIPSk6Nju7l YKNIeRPrF20gbJrWA5vicwmKtuwkJIOCjBfESqKObd2jvjQ6d73achdu5Sb4ahsGkT+6 rBLxcI+A179fneq4qFCNW82jGUI6Q/zuAxpQbt8xFX4NeVSq6qL/gRo36JLmeQV85OpA wkeA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.206.132 with SMTP id e126mr13425245lfg.39.1448507933178; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.1.227 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:18:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56545B4C.3020406@cisco.com>
References: <5e9b22a3942d4a39981878b13e4a7752@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <0630035C-E4F6-41AA-A339-7101B448F0FA@vigilsec.com> <CABkgnnUxSwMmOR=QVE-gMvj9dHW6Tk2Z=EO7RDx6E5zVAp_SrQ@mail.gmail.com> <20151124033325.GH18430@eff.org> <56545B4C.3020406@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:18:53 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: oclNPlKa6QauQKYKuggAC3573Bo
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwg-MktfPZ0TkRgKsTan2dzDSHuaRsrCcfF-Y-HY6aTKmw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11420706cfc52005256908f4"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/QY4LLcPrirvfI4Lo-fWwQ9ODThM>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Peter Eckersley <pde@eff.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 03:18:56 -0000
I am getting really nervous about allowing any port other than 443. I just did a scan of a very recent clean install of Windows and there are a *TON* of Web servers running for apps that didn't mention they had one. The thing is that if I am running a process on any sort of shared host, I can pretty easily spawn a server and start applying for certs for other domains. Not only can I get .well-known, I can have any host name I like.
- [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Douglas Calvert
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Peter Eckersley
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Hugo Landau
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Eliot Lear
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Yoav Nir
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Eliot Lear
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Niklas Keller
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Eliot Lear
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Niklas Keller
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Peter Eckersley
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Eliot Lear
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Yoav Nir
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Rob Stradling
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Yoav Nir
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Darren J Moffat
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Eliot Lear