Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443
Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com> Thu, 26 November 2015 11:43 UTC
Return-Path: <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0FC1A03E3 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 03:43:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.279
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.279 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6CJCZvatWeMS for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 03:43:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mmextmx2.mcr.colo.comodoca.net (mail1.comodoca.com [91.209.196.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11EA61A03A3 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 03:43:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 22885 invoked by uid 1004); 26 Nov 2015 11:43:50 -0000
Received: from ian.brad.office.comodo.net (HELO ian.brad.office.comodo.net) (192.168.0.202) by mmextmx2.mcr.colo.comodoca.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:43:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 25086 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Nov 2015 11:43:50 -0000
Received: from and0004.comodo.net (HELO [192.168.0.58]) (192.168.0.58) (smtp-auth username rob, mechanism plain) by ian.brad.office.comodo.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:43:50 +0000
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <5e9b22a3942d4a39981878b13e4a7752@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <0630035C-E4F6-41AA-A339-7101B448F0FA@vigilsec.com> <CABkgnnUxSwMmOR=QVE-gMvj9dHW6Tk2Z=EO7RDx6E5zVAp_SrQ@mail.gmail.com> <20151124033325.GH18430@eff.org> <56545B4C.3020406@cisco.com> <CAMm+Lwg-MktfPZ0TkRgKsTan2dzDSHuaRsrCcfF-Y-HY6aTKmw@mail.gmail.com> <5656C49E.6070701@cisco.com> <5656E66B.3000803@cs.tcd.ie> <9DCF723A-8CE9-4732-9DEA-ED7EEBA362A9@gmail.com> <5656EEFA.6000109@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
Message-ID: <5656F075.1070704@comodo.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:43:49 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5656EEFA.6000109@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/m3JahzLcnM4JpiNzFDUIXJz2DOs>
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Peter Eckersley <pde@eff.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:43:54 -0000
On 26/11/15 11:37, Stephen Farrell wrote: <snip> > True. A port-specific cert would only work with updated browsers > which I guess is a fairly fatal objection to the idea. Ah well. Is it worth considering requiring proof of control of (some particular combination of) _multiple_ ports rather than just a single port? Would that strengthen the validation in any meaningful way? -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist COMODO - Creating Trust Online
- [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Douglas Calvert
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Peter Eckersley
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Hugo Landau
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Eliot Lear
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Yoav Nir
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Eliot Lear
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Niklas Keller
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Eliot Lear
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Niklas Keller
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Peter Eckersley
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Eliot Lear
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Yoav Nir
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Rob Stradling
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Yoav Nir
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Darren J Moffat
- Re: [Acme] Issue: Allow ports other than 443 Eliot Lear