Re: [Acme] Current Charter language

[⌘ Matt Miller <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 5/15/15 1:20 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Stephen Farrell 
> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 15/05/15 19:38, Ted Hardie wrote:
>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Stephen Farrell 
>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 15/05/15 19:09, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>>> Any other obvious edits needed?
>>> 
>>> LGTM
>> 
>> (no hats)
>> 
>> Me too. I like it and figure it's good enough.
>> 
>> The only thing I'd suggest maybe adding is the illustrative goal 
>> that an "apt-get install apache" should be able to get the 
>> required certificates for a web server automatically, if there is
>> an acme server that is willing to automate that far. And that a
>> subsequent "apt-get upgrade" on that box should ensure that the
>> certificate stuff needed for that apache install gets renewed if
>> necessary.
>> 
>> I can see that it might be tricky to phrase that in language that
>> works in a charter though, but maybe someone's feeling nicely 
>> creative.
>> 
>> 
>> ​ Well, at the moment we says this:
>> 
>> "All of the processing must be done in a manner that is
>> compatible with common service deployment environments, such as
>> hosting environments.​"
>> 
>> Perhaps we can add something just after like this:
>> 
>> "Simplicity in certificate installation and maintenance are key
>> design goals.  Enabling this process to be incorporated into the
>> standard installation and upgrades of web servers via a single
>> command line invocation or flag would be especially desirable".
>> 
>> That's less catchy than "apt-get install acme-cert", but it may
>> be more charter-y.
>> 
>> Is that worth doing?
> I like it anyway. I'm fine if you'd prefer to go ahead without it
> though,
> 
> 
> I like the charter better without it, tbh.  I don't think there's
> any ambiguity in what we're after in this dimension :)
> 
> 

I agree with Richard, FWIW.

And +1 on the rest of the existing charter.  SHIPIT.


- -- 
- - m&m

Matt Miller < [e-mail] >
Cisco Systems, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVVkl0AAoJEDWi+S0W7cO1mA4H/R85YcL8VDmICG6ebl/G1tSn
NksrqJJBBxtsQtw6R2xXWDhJ4QGRPG+Eu3wypQd92uUSb++JwcyF+7B1/pk2gDOO
jWbVjJLzgYsynegMGLYtAiWmOJKK/Ysz/t6UgrqQAtqh83ShqMFCT/dACKfjIAPR
JbZN+AsgIyxCx3jzjjebaHszcy4yBQi91CK8dq/Ok8TKuBs/0D4j+faadcg7QO4o
mtJePv+typLcyWFdE0jg2JxkWSVlVLcjsAWgtMnlTlWCvhaQSyXr9Qlwdp45LptE
MvcYg9xtzOM1bIp1jg2kqeBoK2V2tvjQTSxfsVG46wGnb/Ow1xB5606Zb1jcTQs=
=ryWD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----