Re: [Acme] Current Charter language

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

Stephen:

>>> Any other obvious edits needed?
>> 
>> LGTM
> 
> (no hats)
> 
> Me too. I like it and figure it's good enough.
> 
> The only thing I'd suggest maybe adding is the illustrative goal
> that an "apt-get install apache" should be able to get the required
> certificates for a web server automatically, if there is an acme
> server that is willing to automate that far. And that a subsequent
> "apt-get upgrade" on that box should ensure that the certificate
> stuff needed for that apache install gets renewed if necessary.
> 
> I can see that it might be tricky to phrase that in language
> that works in a charter though, but maybe someone's feeling nicely
> creative.
> 
> The reason to want this in (for me) is that I think that example
> can ground the work and be useful to head off some potential rat
> holes that might otherwise crop up. And it captures the by far
> most important requirement for acme to meet which is good to keep
> in front of us.

I would rather ship the charter as it is.

While "apt-get" stuff is very interesting, it is not the only way to implement the protocol.

Russ