IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [admin-discuss] [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Fri, 25 February 2022 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5593A0E3E; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 05:19:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3sA4L5-iitb; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 05:19:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D363B3A0DD1; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 05:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.203.15] (24.206.164.109.static.wline.lns.sme.cust.swisscom.ch [109.164.206.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 21PDJ3iC285403 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:19:03 +0100
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1645795146; bh=9JGv6wFMrb9cisHpaYpS1V7lH3ig0bg2GAXLnceIWtU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=iR3dX0zM7IrUydjDhp8DABU8CXDaPYIWLvGvPRWSO1EmZ9HiwDy5wIwy6/s7nRVLM cigUi+xb78jSBGz2GU6UVhDERqa4xD340MIapQQ4PbBjht2/PcSGzYDr7zrYCZT5o2 xgRiCRhfLUaIrPCN1iiKQdox7TXRvq4ELrCgExFY=
Message-ID: <12b11ad6-6e65-7824-de5b-6b57797260ab@lear.ch>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:19:02 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'Colin Perkins' <csp@csperkins.org>, 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, admin-discuss@ietf.org, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, ietf@ietf.org
References: <164574145917.13799.12710132950530774405@ietfa.amsl.com> <f761ac6b-4b12-c606-75ec-bb634b23506a@gmail.com> <AB70A284-D11B-421A-A328-46D771C483FA@csperkins.org> <036301d82a23$0897aed0$19c70c70$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <036301d82a23$0897aed0$19c70c70$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------ZbyLYpR7xZpeG2NUedaiGMll"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/admin-discuss/HZNuTE7lDMxhUUwChDFsh04Oyuk>
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications
X-BeenThere: admin-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF LLC administrative issues <admin-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/admin-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:admin-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:19:20 -0000

On 25.02.22 09:38, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Indeed. I can confirm that the ISE was consulted about whether to apply this
> to the Independent Stream, and I thought it a useful measure.
> Eliot, as the new ISE, can confirm whether he wants to continue with that or
> not.

And I haven't had an opportunity to consider the matter just yet.  If 
you have thoughts, feel free to send them my way.

Eliot

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status