IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [admin-discuss] [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 25 February 2022 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D692E3A105B for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:12:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HemiL5hss01Q for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:12:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0B7C3A105C for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:12:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id y5so3206635ill.13 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:12:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C2ZM893xAeDZgqOQP3ZJImVnqO+LS9NOLYxqOpMHt9U=; b=JKq849bcgDP7VtGaKdt/GhWkBqz47CI/fLGwag5D2Wujb8S8B0cbZJssHo7ooPyhWT JE05BcR2Qg70sa9O5/ndQZGyBlbwmRBfaFmvDwgXd96LaXOF4XTHTpW6p9EmGJFkMEWF 8z7mHRZ5yMROCzK3sfi5ILkhq8BBZf5XyBv+M1EZknUUirYnlh/YL8wS+EKXr3nmRMHu rzwdcG7a0zRepzP3iti9wj1oJehfCqpPcETbHnzy0QvBO1fAyFWDrvHQNfpqQLLnUsxf LRyyEDYlA2e5swbW8fwwt5TbkWkxFepvkAql1W/g+R63WSfmwveRMikQOHqmCE0F2oFg +3OA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C2ZM893xAeDZgqOQP3ZJImVnqO+LS9NOLYxqOpMHt9U=; b=wq+RwDAvuSg9ogszQ4ddPZDhn7WRfSEDGOf+k7CWKuNgdw0s3Si+LEuaTEn3Y+sbiD OCv64yS0xqQvvCcGgZXViaWmQJ6GYTJQSKjzKOJsarvLjRLgg0O0WlGWASObAIauzFb5 HZjoJbpb3zIh95qa0FZ0PKOuAGsa4mMYjomQv6G6fC6OYsm1Novqk9Soj2uooZHksmO+ W4StzIL0mmPk8qf6F5CkuUQVvFNX2ktW9OncHv0UOsjQcJW6CE77VXu9aiwE830/l5fK 5bI32LjaGxc0TksAltDOkH5DiCweQx+NyGyuGxXXUBkUgcm+39ECBOZ9A8Svgw06P5b2 Ho7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nHkEXcibmlGsJMR1+Jn5iDPDodGgNjnTh5a0+OD8PAi8Rhsm5 LwLMM1jGCr0bsDl+Ybv2h0VJi5015R0MVwgPpzLFjw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAlAYVBlsPtWTjI7riTbA1BL8l6vS1oNOz8HFJ/1kRiIA1v68mkUBN6uBhjpuIET9eqqwircrIlgdXzIZJ6nw=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:b05:0:b0:2b7:ee19:ee15 with SMTP id b5-20020a920b05000000b002b7ee19ee15mr4580967ilf.10.1645755173062; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:12:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164574145917.13799.12710132950530774405@ietfa.amsl.com> <f761ac6b-4b12-c606-75ec-bb634b23506a@gmail.com> <DD2DC8FA-246C-4B49-8C3C-5CB3BEC2E681@tzi.org> <941a9ac4-7649-c492-f149-1ae7964b1ae6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <941a9ac4-7649-c492-f149-1ae7964b1ae6@gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:12:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNF7LB8Wq4q+-n3dF_ex_UJH+3y25+-b+5U5TtBoGjYyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, admin-discuss@ietf.org, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007a616b05d8ce3c2d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/admin-discuss/ykrp7Yxw70-lX-LBMelZr35Kr0E>
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications
X-BeenThere: admin-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF LLC administrative issues <admin-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/admin-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:admin-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 02:12:59 -0000

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 6:07 PM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 25-Feb-22 14:44, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> > On 25. Feb 2022, at 01:42, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Our proposal: to set up a public mailing list of AUTH48 conversations,
> >>
> >> Please confirm that this is only for IETF stream documents so far.
> >
> > We already discussed this in the IRSG and would like to join.
> >
> > My personal take: We have enough ossification of RFC-related matters; I
> don’t think we need to push this one up to 2026.
> > The RSWG can tweak this when they get to power.
>
> No, that assumes a fait accompli and that is very much against the spirit
> of community-approved RFC policy which is what people have been demanding
> for several years. Running an experiment now is fine, declaring a policy
> isn't.
>
> I would expect the RSWG/RSAB to be operational a month or two from now;
> the last calls expire on March 7.
>

I concur with Brian and I appreciate him catching this.

-Ekr


>
>      Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status