Re: [admin-discuss] [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 26 February 2022 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68053A0B48; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 09:42:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ViwWsLfRp58Q; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 09:42:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D163A0ABA; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 09:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4K5YrJ27hvzDCbx; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 18:42:40 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <8129A65C40CD88E0B5C94AA8@PSB>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 18:42:39 +0100
Cc: "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, admin-discuss@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 667590159.880187-cfbd5bdc2ecb7266b4521ec42d7cd2d9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7BC3F808-434B-48CF-B96B-0CF7D8B9F3A7@tzi.org>
References: <164574145917.13799.12710132950530774405@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMC+vkyMPbt755Bu0cZHfmY-Pz6CdU1-J+8sBa8cPkA0dg@mail.gmail.c om> <CABcZeBMeRFOU+az=b8QJmD+-4GHivwZenMHEXsrbnamuoEmwEA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAg_xbTODu=UE288uxTVhL=+r18p5ywC6ZGaUvpyXO8bA@mail.gmail.c om> <7C442BD6-F634-4129-9764-1BE29382D629@att.com> <8129A65C40CD88E0B5C94AA8@PSB>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/admin-discuss/_8eCOJZCMRITvmIUihRMmAq745c>
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications
X-BeenThere: admin-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF LLC administrative issues <admin-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/admin-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:admin-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 17:43:03 -0000

On 2022-02-26, at 17:53, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> 
> I have tried to review this very active discussion up to
> now.  

I’m starting to understand that this discussion is a great dress rehearsal for how RSWG will operate.

Maybe we can take the opportunity and kick off the experiment proposed by the IESG now and go into the greater discussions once RSWG is operational.

Grüße, Carsten