Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector

Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com> Fri, 13 November 2020 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AFA3A1345 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:18:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ly4XXamOLM6w for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:18:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com (mail-yb1-xb36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E32783A1342 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id t33so7464868ybd.0 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:18:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y8N+joFQdQtVEP/WOLnk51ur8vFTxLIGq9/nsX8D9tU=; b=HIfMdbhilq/clP/7vsn8dKegKLywdVxmW/boToHRZYDvCFdHwGuB5rBIU3oKkar6UA /wOuGKZw7yryGJSEPdGy8bx8pq2T+1nMkxROkW440DDqbdpnnd3C4f76LlddD68MnbL+ guT85t9eAk5jDWfzeBx+dibH1B1MVOpogYFb5GSuXEL0SzHOjmNfZ3DeAiyXVhA0RQAQ 6xqPwIOZFRkdivEt34Lw5vYTlLV2N/P+i9+9gdvqOegcfgbLOxkXMQxcRdChUNrWMk0Z w+nnLoWXLWQq37fYwDeX/7+eAJXqgKhVF1OwZiiFj//79gZlM6EtPpjz/fGhQj/HuqpA 0w0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y8N+joFQdQtVEP/WOLnk51ur8vFTxLIGq9/nsX8D9tU=; b=gwiDtrbjDRh7Th/OG3jTD8pCdcYq+kSVehUgFq6WEFfA5qkJeVUpL+PKYJaOLBjzMK 8XSDZfkxaDvtcH1i4t7K01SE2Kcqifr2ev3Kc5AvBJCYgsOAgBnr4t/Ygt2P4eWW7yWC FqmhzKHlweedrPaw5Tf+7iz2EdjGXJZrpRJQ0aVOlsiNDdGqc8N7ubaXrIsJJTIj2cu5 UO+gyIJoVBig39z+kDqcDjAXoV04V5QBTqggqwB+JzLq3eydpUxLg1nKclNds37oD41b dDPmZkce8uBq/K89dYhD01tVERlbjH5PqHMnvcYCRa6pEEIOQUSewXB5VRyWdOoeAElx ZWag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533d8E4kPqebozJ5oIkOvTnyUdcVtqLkyznhhVj/mM8tcGtQZJwv f6/BZaMTGrL/PKWAaM1C4SyMph5Qxib65d9JnxnUw/QB358nDw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxuTTKqg3oDZgQ1cRfCRlAndivjMbpfmB9j1BEnLCBUbF+Ut2lDdthLkocJBDM12oSgMC8/HPSvt3OO6S3r2x8=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d3cf:: with SMTP id e198mr217428ybf.292.1605237501944; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:18:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMTW_LAKfPYiD3PFveRAoHe+_WxxU6McRsMzKDVrg5T87j6Yg@mail.gmail.com> <PR3PR07MB70187439187DB78D878381F095E70@PR3PR07MB7018.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CANUuoLqSLLXTnrXRvepDYv3zDtsLYEjKZt1bKDbn_A4-oMy+4g@mail.gmail.com> <DB749E27-861A-4387-919F-CCF8A238D221@wdroome.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB749E27-861A-4387-919F-CCF8A238D221@wdroome.com>
From: Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:18:09 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAbpuyoQD1C3YnLhh+1vQO8A9P5kWy1bzfQQB29EJeMsa4uqKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001567fc05b3f47be2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/--tipS72LkjcIsGZ6QMQVJ6qpuY>
Subject: Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 03:18:25 -0000

Hi Vijay,

Sorry for my late reply.

I want to mention that Kai and I are implementing the latest version of
these three documents. The implementation will be open-source on GitHub
[1]. But it is still in progress. We may have a release by the next IETF.

As Richard mentioned, we have an implementation for a very early version of
the path vector document [2]. It is only for OpenFlow-based networks. And
we didn't integrate unified properties.

I remember Danny also has an implementation of the unified properties
document.

[1] https://github.com/openalto/sextant
[2] https://github.com/openalto/mercator-setup

Best,
Jensen


On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 5:30 AM Wendy Roome <wendy@wdroome.com> wrote:

> Vijay,
>
>
>
> My server did support PID properties and allowed endpoints to inherit
> them, and had a “get-all-props” extension.
>
>
>
> But it didn’t implement the current version.
>
>
>
>    - Wendy
>
>
>
> *From: *alto <alto-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Y. Richard Yang" <
> yry@cs.yale.edu>
> *Date: *Thu, November 12, 2020 at 12:58
> *To: *"Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <
> sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>
> *Cc: *IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni,
> path-vector
>
>
>
> Hi Vijay,
>
>
>
> - I believe that there was an implementation of unified properties by
> Wendy Roome. But it is for an earlier version, not the latest one which we
> just posted.
>
>
>
> - I understand that there was an implementation of path vector used in
> super computing demonstration; but it was for an earlier version of path
> vector without the integration of unified properties.
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:43 PM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia -
> FR/Paris-Saclay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vijay,
>
>
>
> To my knowledge,
>
>
>
> - there is no implementation of Unified Properties that reflects the
> latest design updates, defined in 2019 and 2020,
>
> - I am not aware of any implementation of Path Vector.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sabine
>
>
>
> *From:* alto <alto-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Vijay Gurbani
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 11, 2020 5:57 PM
> *To:* IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni,
> path-vector
>
>
>
> All: I am the shepherd for the three drafts identified in the subject.
>
>
>
> As I prepare the shepherd writeup, I will like to document if there are
> any implementations of these three drafts that the WG members are aware
> of.  These implementations can be private (a few individuals working on the
> drafts), or be more formal with a GitHub repository and a larger community.
>
>
>
> If any WG member is aware of implementations, please let me know.  Please
> drop me an email (or  post on the list) with the details as you know them.
> I would like to kindly ask you to do this as soon as possible ---
> preferably by the end of this week --- to allow me to prepare the shepherd
> writeup.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> - vijay
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>
> --
>
> Richard
>
> _______________________________________________ alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>