Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
Wendy Roome <wendy@wdroome.com> Thu, 12 November 2020 21:30 UTC
Return-Path: <wendy@wdroome.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFE03A0995 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:30:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uM3X3gaCH6pg for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:30:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from itihasa.pair.com (itihasa.pair.com [209.68.5.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 204D63A0989 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:30:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from itihasa.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by itihasa.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04BA8FC64; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:30:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.0.60] (unknown [IPv6:2601:703:0:e3a0:25f5:3612:385a:293c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by itihasa.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B8EE8FC46; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:30:43 -0500 (EST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:30:41 -0500
From: Wendy Roome <wendy@wdroome.com>
To: "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>, "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>
CC: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <DB749E27-861A-4387-919F-CCF8A238D221@wdroome.com>
Thread-Topic: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
References: <CAMMTW_LAKfPYiD3PFveRAoHe+_WxxU6McRsMzKDVrg5T87j6Yg@mail.gmail.com> <PR3PR07MB70187439187DB78D878381F095E70@PR3PR07MB7018.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CANUuoLqSLLXTnrXRvepDYv3zDtsLYEjKZt1bKDbn_A4-oMy+4g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANUuoLqSLLXTnrXRvepDYv3zDtsLYEjKZt1bKDbn_A4-oMy+4g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3688043443_2102007209"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/v7n48NxD6QCXOtqqge0ErZc1HLQ>
Subject: Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:30:47 -0000
Vijay, My server did support PID properties and allowed endpoints to inherit them, and had a “get-all-props” extension. But it didn’t implement the current version. Wendy From: alto <alto-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu> Date: Thu, November 12, 2020 at 12:58 To: "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com> Cc: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector Hi Vijay, - I believe that there was an implementation of unified properties by Wendy Roome. But it is for an earlier version, not the latest one which we just posted. - I understand that there was an implementation of path vector used in super computing demonstration; but it was for an earlier version of path vector without the integration of unified properties. Richard On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:43 PM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote: Hi Vijay, To my knowledge, - there is no implementation of Unified Properties that reflects the latest design updates, defined in 2019 and 2020, - I am not aware of any implementation of Path Vector. Best regards, Sabine From: alto <alto-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 5:57 PM To: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org> Subject: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector All: I am the shepherd for the three drafts identified in the subject. As I prepare the shepherd writeup, I will like to document if there are any implementations of these three drafts that the WG members are aware of. These implementations can be private (a few individuals working on the drafts), or be more formal with a GitHub repository and a larger community. If any WG member is aware of implementations, please let me know. Please drop me an email (or post on the list) with the details as you know them. I would like to kindly ask you to do this as soon as possible --- preferably by the end of this week --- to allow me to prepare the shepherd writeup. Thank you. - vijay _______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto -- Richard _______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
- [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto… Vijay Gurbani
- Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, … Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, … Y. Richard Yang
- Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, … Wendy Roome
- Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, … Jensen Zhang
- Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, … Vijay Gurbani