IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14, ends October 7th / 3 review questions

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 08 December 2025 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: anima@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9692979C9F5 for <anima@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 12:45:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r8ROE7h1jThR for <anima@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 12:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816C3979C9E1 for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 12:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F0A18014; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 15:45:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id qtN1kEzJi-QN; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 15:45:25 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1765226725; bh=Ziucj5v8dHTWkRuhyZTSbNTbtJDAQoBujmtdHs/pYEk=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ZOYZXQZMsFQ8hNJH0nWKaZKdqVe24BUtI424ieJp8rq/s/5bhOfZQ8gri+ajeSA9E LToCpuxn/euZ47U3gFAHXHnWg4jFtyLQluxjh9Y7Tdq13ZwS0CCG8WD7ss9rKPyC0q 5n5l8W+anYB8HAEhYf2eNXqbcVgo9iw6o+uaEG9vPN97glRI55/Ii5LzTiP4rOMTJ9 CpXsuXy2V6vfNq9cYH8cYuv7szDSlOWBVSSsEl+5AzFyVdIN5e+gvGkOJyHA6eG0Wx H6juG3jzHJ0FLVC50PJxw+1smV7+tFW8SHuRlpK+hotSn3hAXk4Oeo1wL8vmkChmNe D8BZsDi4tx+bQ==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2518218011; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 15:45:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9DE184; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 15:45:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, anima <anima@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <523014ff-f161-44c7-b3cc-6cddd3a40d79@iotconsultancy.nl>
References: <tencent_1E7D9B1D5F6FA1025FE88D43@qq.com> <cb6c358d-21d0-414d-a99f-7abf686e5f2b@iotconsultancy.nl> <369125.1762825378@dyas> <e944f55e-596a-45c7-a990-e777ab8056b3@iotconsultancy.nl> <601.1764190181@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <218feaecce1bc4d559752369293a8f4f@my.soverin.net> <19274.1764887661@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <98c19ba8-7d36-4061-a389-df6fba69f7b4@iotconsultancy.nl> <20497.1764951908@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <523014ff-f161-44c7-b3cc-6cddd3a40d79@iotconsultancy.nl>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; Emacs 30.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 15:45:25 -0500
Message-ID: <28785.1765226725@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: G27C5O2ZVXE2JFLHD6WNMXDRN3VVFBYQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: G27C5O2ZVXE2JFLHD6WNMXDRN3VVFBYQ
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14, ends October 7th / 3 review questions
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/63Jjwpy3TFWXg2d3J2uSri_YyFQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>

Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
    >> I think you are saying that the yang module in the I-D did not match what we had
    >> because something was not re-processed in makefile?

    > Yes this is the most probable cause! I wasn't really sure if this had
    > happened.

I ran
  kramdown-rfc-extract-sourcecode -d n
  /corp/ietf/cache/id/ietf/anima/rfc8366bis-19.xml

and compared the result to yang/*.yang, and I see that you are right.

I'm not sure why extract-sourcecode creates:

  -rw-r--r-- 1 mcr oldmcr  9463 Dec  8 15:37 ietf-voucher-request-module.yang
  -rw-r--r-- 1 mcr oldmcr 12425 Dec  8 15:37 yang-module.yang

as the file names, but meh.

I pine for $Id$ a la CVS from 1999.

I'm posting -20 now.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.36.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status