[Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14, ends October 7th / 3 review questions
Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> Mon, 24 November 2025 15:06 UTC
Return-Path: <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
X-Original-To: anima@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: anima@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B17C8F89CC3 for <anima@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:06:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iotconsultancy.nl
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9L_oQgKcFJiD for <anima@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:06:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [IPv6:2a10:de80:1:4092:b9e9:2292:0:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4200E8F89CBA for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:06:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04cst-smtp-sov01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dFTfx37Xwz60; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:06:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4dFTfx13Cdz1g; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:06:17 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=iotconsultancy.nl header.i=@iotconsultancy.nl header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=DaHP0gVX; dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iotconsultancy.nl; s=soverin1; t=1763996777; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nZjSMS8y71FUrb81r78SIrpVkxkoSPvXLHP722s+R30=; b=DaHP0gVXwIZl6BFEHZWoh0WRngiZNHllHMm+IZjzwTG/jEoA+RhfijZ+JssXXAUEgxzVKJ f7NMyZgfeeKXYXLtu7+N3nBZssVdE730yQxLn6lqK0ZReis8o/cn/K7zoy40zDpNk2vQhy eE/NFjBVCaHGanYBhGSL4tcGLgeKdDa6Bs1wj1M3MY0056jgMdP2ynOOQIIPRWT9aM66t8 Kc2PWuIYMfhvI9+Mv+egFBS8k0U3vVCNNyyjhrmscKEFvOwa7Y4SuvdG5i0/IU5J5xIwoW jWGTjdliS85cfMl5oxyc87oYvsE5LVtU+xasjtrKd9c9DC67d0eRH/8osJTDQg==
X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=UsCZN/wB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=69247469 a=+jLwPyc1Smuc6Y4mGHyyNQ==:617 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=lTrhJCJeAAAA:8 a=RZVkaoGZ31KqmYxWsO8A:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=T1qlrscwSY9gHchI9BsA:9 a=IycfjIq86YUq-3VE:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=lqcHg5cX4UMA:10 a=msQidb1V7qGuAPALg0EV:22
X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfFZmvHRuCA6B6O4IHWfWsZlgD8qPtRwmwKvzwpFnyD8+i0Ez5LitKHFtlgCKchVoLHSWi1g8Bvnv4pdPdyit0TkqIxlENTZHlLCEAXVewS1SkYTLCwq/ v3ROESFzCoDZZzlih24P45NfpsJBfkYchsO59YPemsCdrhM78PZzjpY1Aum2zpkj8mt5cbuwqmrCXK0HsK2XOn13s34dI6dvzLpjs25VxXDWHQkEBz7UpA+q cTlDUYS+eQuFTtVzmTNOcetOzufZDY0uflHhYnu4YLMOYAhILdEBOIBPDBg+AFPnUIsyMFQVuxW/C9JMDs28M2q0YqJbRVRCRGxjiA+x/PQ=
X-Soverin-Id: 019ab666-ba28-7c81-b8f7-c982b24149f4
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------ny7S70yS6tfI1UK69Z7RWD64"
Message-ID: <e944f55e-596a-45c7-a990-e777ab8056b3@iotconsultancy.nl>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:06:16 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, anima <anima@ietf.org>
References: <tencent_1E7D9B1D5F6FA1025FE88D43@qq.com> <cb6c358d-21d0-414d-a99f-7abf686e5f2b@iotconsultancy.nl> <369125.1762825378@dyas>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
Organization: IoTconsultancy.nl
In-Reply-To: <369125.1762825378@dyas>
X-Spampanel-Class: ham
Message-ID-Hash: NZNFPUJAQ5OZB4LCZFLJ6AEXO6QRWOCF
X-Message-ID-Hash: NZNFPUJAQ5OZB4LCZFLJ6AEXO6QRWOCF
X-MailFrom: esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14, ends October 7th / 3 review questions
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/VHmKuwUYN2ppYRLp6pP3JyR13rQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>
> I didn't see any inconsistent capitalization among the Terminology, but I
> could have missed some.
> If you see specific things, let's fix them now, but the RPC will deal with
> the rest.
Coming back to this question; I did see specific things that are
probably easy to find/see and also fix now.
The RPC can fix things for sure, but changes they make aren't
necessarily visible to the WG or the wider community; and then only one
document author typically gets to make the call.
While I think we prefer to have the WG decide on this and make the
AD/IESG/IETF reviewers life easier.
So that there should be no doubt if a "Voucher Request" is the same
thing as a "voucher-request" or not :)
My proposal for terms is:
1) have pledge, registrar, voucher, voucher request, voucher artifact,
certificate authority, all in lowercase to prevent lots of uppercase in
ordinary text. Change "voucher-request" to "voucher request" except
where language-wise impossible.
Currently Pledge is capitalized while other terms are mostly not. I
don't see a reason to have Pledge be an exception.
(Uppercased all of these terms can be done also if we really prefer
that...)
2) use uppercase (also for these terms) in section titles and similar
headings (as is common)
3) use uppercase (also for these terms) in the Terminology section (so
that readers know it's referring to another Term from the same list
which they can look up).
4) use single quotes ('example', 'signerInfo', ... ) for referring to
literal field names
I can add these things to the editorial PR if that's ok?
Esko
On 11-11-2025 02:42, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I went through some of the terms, and I fixed a few things that some
> reviewers have complained about, DNS Registrar != BRSKI Registrar.
> I didn't see any inconsistent capitalization among the Terminology, but I
> could have missed some.
> If you see specific things, let's fix them now, but the RPC will deal with
> the rest.
--
*IoTconsultancy.nl* | Email/Teams: esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl | +31 6
2385 8339
- [Anima] WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14, … Sheng JIANG
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Esko Dijk
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Esko Dijk
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Esko Dijk
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Esko Dijk
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Esko Dijk
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Carsten Bormann
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Carsten Bormann
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Carsten Bormann
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Michael Richardson
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Carsten Bormann
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… Brian E Carpenter
- [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-… William Atwood