IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14, ends October 7th / 3 review questions

Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> Fri, 05 December 2025 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
X-Original-To: anima@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: anima@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBF7963311F for <anima@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 13:19:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iotconsultancy.nl
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNAg5b9g1tcS for <anima@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 13:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dane.soverin.net (dane.soverin.net [IPv6:2a10:de80:1:4092:b9e9:2296:0:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5770F9633116 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 13:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dNPQc5jS7zhv; Fri, 05 Dec 2025 21:19:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4dNPQc3VZ7z7h; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:19:36 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=iotconsultancy.nl header.i=@iotconsultancy.nl header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=w9s1PcLl; dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iotconsultancy.nl; s=soverin1; t=1764969576; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eBxeSxIsFRoMm89NC4kgDDG4tulYqiCkE1zQ+aJY4PM=; b=w9s1PcLlYn4nqi1n1lPQsJviZizU7SfvC5byYMyWV8z0+m5z+BWqwQFOsTyt23R4RYC2gj xAfHZqVgSeMqCdyVnFEnlEWUfNC6qzALPcak6YKgUB4Htq94vR3jo2xeFZo8f3sBjoaReP 417SW9I6gQ2FE192h77CP3ecnlZ7S1EXVwfnaftOzRyzAMrveK/RnbS14ux2b2lveZFglI L7jX66Ps6eelxC6M7Jnk9HJOtercZp+uwQidXaX1Hlamc1qT1gFkoezpJnfKuSKl3K4gCA TTiLYetYmGaOmofd71PNijRTB+xf2D8xK2hij8/bifMfhRJYqy+LV39zX4Y/BA==
X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfF9iKGEreCq2R1fpK8nWSnbUnfr0gJNMjZ5R6u3MQ+iWYD73lq6Ar76Z7b66e6jlTKR0+gjJEN1sEgfN8IkyCcSaB65zokhbpQQ1In+Lvw8JSC9okf8y wzBkjswr7JfjeA6c1/9vTr+kRgvZSrPp8CqLTMnuuSeTJAKNAwQgKU5BZ4WruxKeh7xAv3woKi7fg1pHuLPapJoeII/qjs4q/6w3eA89oBrX7ylW2xhIeOEt
X-Soverin-Id: 019af062-7640-7bbf-b14c-61f3c3efda5e
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------ngAX0HoQ1X3awS7FNbE6nQPM"
Message-ID: <523014ff-f161-44c7-b3cc-6cddd3a40d79@iotconsultancy.nl>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 22:19:36 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, anima <anima@ietf.org>
References: <tencent_1E7D9B1D5F6FA1025FE88D43@qq.com> <cb6c358d-21d0-414d-a99f-7abf686e5f2b@iotconsultancy.nl> <369125.1762825378@dyas> <e944f55e-596a-45c7-a990-e777ab8056b3@iotconsultancy.nl> <601.1764190181@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <218feaecce1bc4d559752369293a8f4f@my.soverin.net> <19274.1764887661@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <98c19ba8-7d36-4061-a389-df6fba69f7b4@iotconsultancy.nl> <20497.1764951908@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
Organization: IoTconsultancy.nl
In-Reply-To: <20497.1764951908@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
X-Spampanel-Class: ham
Message-ID-Hash: HEHOLCYCQX42UEGKDGZSIKEPVRPVI2D7
X-Message-ID-Hash: HEHOLCYCQX42UEGKDGZSIKEPVRPVI2D7
X-MailFrom: esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14, ends October 7th / 3 review questions
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/wV-LytMJesFtHX9072v9FoSmn3Y>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>

> I think you are saying that the yang module in the I-D did not match what we had
> because something was not re-processed in makefile?

Yes this is the most probable cause! I wasn't really sure if this had 
happened.

Esko

-- 
*IoTconsultancy.nl* | Email/Teams: esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl | +31 6 
2385 8339

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status