IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14, ends October 7th / 3 review questions

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 05 December 2025 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: anima@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027AC96138BF for <anima@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:25:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGjnNQjELA8D for <anima@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:25:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0803596138B2 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:25:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6016C18013; Fri, 05 Dec 2025 11:25:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id n8di8hfXpufr; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 11:25:08 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1764951908; bh=1OodUiDEmN2rRYlbDNOop5JNnWsAxAZ6X34cHw6pBcQ=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Wk3ymqgFSpI7PYkzR7X/HTW8Vq/8AGMKqhvqmwnXKCGps/9/j+2HmejFcsleSC5ga eadrpC4zYgKs0+yy+rCb7vbaqDif2A6fgxHsFTn+/bYa5oaxdNRmrUxfdaVQhujoKX jjMR5iY5CrikhZf9V0gpx8+yKHrzuy2ccvzJwPoLVs9IvLguUVgrHTsEo6IEn+jO9K Rr1jyn9zMLwkTA0m94eFv/5V0RPV8gfyCASQf0QAm9oGuSJhmu8fP8bnEijaFcfkYH dKfjllboJnSPfPDSLjd4a78Mn7j2WqDXYHnLEFMrPVnwaxa5EJEcIHT3SIFCt6Nya/ f8ngd8fJ997mA==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FCC18012; Fri, 05 Dec 2025 11:25:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC5B17A; Fri, 05 Dec 2025 11:25:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, anima <anima@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <98c19ba8-7d36-4061-a389-df6fba69f7b4@iotconsultancy.nl>
References: <tencent_1E7D9B1D5F6FA1025FE88D43@qq.com> <cb6c358d-21d0-414d-a99f-7abf686e5f2b@iotconsultancy.nl> <369125.1762825378@dyas> <e944f55e-596a-45c7-a990-e777ab8056b3@iotconsultancy.nl> <601.1764190181@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <218feaecce1bc4d559752369293a8f4f@my.soverin.net> <19274.1764887661@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <98c19ba8-7d36-4061-a389-df6fba69f7b4@iotconsultancy.nl>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; Emacs 30.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 11:25:08 -0500
Message-ID: <20497.1764951908@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: DMCY7N4RF7PL26AX2P4IW4LMZ6PRHWXH
X-Message-ID-Hash: DMCY7N4RF7PL26AX2P4IW4LMZ6PRHWXH
X-MailFrom: mcr@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Anima] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14, ends October 7th / 3 review questions
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/6ONqMSAPvbwhqRU5aHyH5ryXpMA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>

Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
    > The -19 has an issue that the YANG module descriptions are not updated
    > w.r.t. what we have in the repository!
    > Just as an example, the dual "revision" statement which was merged does not
    > show up in -19. And there's more.

Oh.

    > In particular, for the SID allocation tables the '...' notation needs to be
    > defined (see PR).
    > And the module SID allocations would be nice to repeat in the table too - no
    > need to exclude there.

Probably, we should do a show-and-tell for netmod/netconf about this display.

    > When submitting the -20, we should check that the changes made in the YANG
    > module actually propagate to the draft text to be uploaded.

I think you are saying that the yang module in the I-D did not match what we had
because something was not re-processed in makefile?

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status