IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Ted Lemon's Block on charter-ietf-anima-00-15: (with BLOCK)

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 30 October 2014 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9E01ACF0B; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KT6xppSKNonZ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53F7A1ACF0A; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF85DDA0223; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:32:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3262A53E084; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.107] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:29:09 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5451925C.6080106@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:28:53 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <9A68F3DD-7703-41CE-8502-A0CFFC14E4C5@nominum.com>
References: <20141030002338.25808.63071.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5451925C.6080106@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/Eol0upJ8qYWUYqJvNU6UDi8-Vc0
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] Ted Lemon's Block on charter-ietf-anima-00-15: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:29:41 -0000

On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:20 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> That doesn't logically exclude common components in the solution,
> of course. But there are IMHO strong reasons not to create any dependency
> of homenet on results from anima.

I agree.  I just don't see that in the charter.   To be clear, simply saying "we will consult homenet" and "we are interested in professionally managed networks" doesn't really convey that point, because you haven't said how what you are doing is different.  If the only difference is the size of the network, that's pretty weak, and I don't think that _is_ the only difference.   I think you intend to do something that looks a lot different, even if there are some common elements at the bottom.   I'm just asking you to articulate what that difference is in the charter.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email