Re: [Anima] Ted Lemon's Block on charter-ietf-anima-00-15: (with BLOCK)

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 30 October 2014 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3B91ACF8C; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PmZVDSu-oMOK; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C6201ACF58; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041DADA021F; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:50:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487B753E084; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.107] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:46:32 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <54519567.8020201@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:46:16 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <62558186-114B-43DD-AFBF-29717C804D68@nominum.com>
References: <20141030002338.25808.63071.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <54519567.8020201@bogus.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/feXDwkk8Q3hwfqdTE-hCvtP6_m4
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] Ted Lemon's Block on charter-ietf-anima-00-15: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:47:03 -0000

On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:33 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
> ...
> Additionally, management and optimisation of operational device
> configurations is
> expensive, tedious, and prone to human error.
> ...
> This WG is intended to mitigate this duplication of similar mechanisms
> and heavy
> dependency on human actions, in particular by facilitating secure
> closed-loop
> interaction directly between network elements to satisfy management intent.
> This motivates the introduction of a control paradigm where network
> processes,
> driven by objectives (or intent), coordinate their local decisions,
> autonomically translate them into local actions, and adapt them
> automatically
> according to various sources of information including external
> information and
> protocol information bases.
> ...
> 
> Speaks to the nature of managed, deliberately designed and laid out but
> automatically triggered set of autonomic actions.

OK, that helps.   I didn't really get that from the text, though.   How about:

 This WG will develop a system of autonomic functions that carry
 out the intentions of the network operator without the need for detailed
 low-level management of individual devices.   This will be done by providing
 a secure closed-loop interaction mechanism whereby network elements
 cooperate directly to satisfy management intent.

 The working group will develop a control paradigm where network
 processes coordinate their decisions and automatically translate
 them into local actions, based on various sources of information
 including operator-supplied configuration information and protocol
 information bases.

But what are protocol information bases?   do you mean MIBs and YANG schemas?