Re: [Anima] possible last minute changes to anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra (was Re: Handling of endpoint path names (from BRSKI-AE discussion today))

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 04 August 2020 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B643A1184 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=mRJoh1wM; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=sbJmYeTf
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2nO_hJDvbVce for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76FB43A1147 for <anima@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DFCC7F; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 19:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 19:25:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=i 7qJm8Vr2ZxWLxu6HJJNSNAa8te46HIC0TD2SfQBN0g=; b=mRJoh1wME7LPRfoyE DhdaiRYVHmihRfQ+Gnl9QSqF9Vs2+vPa3PnzUxjkQrxdCograL+ooJZyKsbwMfxL GEDSTzkCmdSwHwwf+F1+qw+UzHEos9MP6gsJUmhnyWk1PffoWgQkqLgOXQGore0y WrM+ktv1gDGIFZc9JmeFgzNqgb6hoRV7911LUV186LK15iN7k2lAjuAfWCUFspqN nXEDvMjgBPbAHm2CZ48jGdHpe+m3Ll90RzZDK6xKTAsHSZBXmIr0gTUzBAFNLEuT bzjFeaXfXGlYKmUBHp+lxrrZjgqjBbiya2IjJDL21qAkqkVAyVWu2yO6mYk65NAz yyldw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=i7qJm8Vr2ZxWLxu6HJJNSNAa8te46HIC0TD2SfQBN 0g=; b=sbJmYeTf9QBk+n2KIjDz0cDnqQBh9Q1XSU53t/PRuwO3KnH3AI3r8VS+j TDUK3KpGaymVxJhBvzOMCrtsBlO9EXDhcgXFvI6rIbMxNAVBHU/X/q/Q5dcKHcrM nMnsMi451MdUv76zPzPF9T4rXD10cxzylFFn3NiHCj+p0xkN3rNZDalb+X8d7KYh /UsqaSES6ITLRZqYCqto4lCCtKO41pzP7o4bBjhy3Z+Oe0EFeMuSiNo9QaQOUw8a wOfjwlvx2iw3Y4q5M5FQrxH/WcF760m5A0fHBxfz0Y+w3NO53v+FWuw5i8uYrAcz kUD38dj+WIcNijtfCk9yVrTMns1ag==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:VO4pXzD7GnCLzXs9PxVzEskGWq6eQipMU2DAwrUrGlo-fjcgU6QQfQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrjeejgddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmh dthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhkucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhn ohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtfeehiedtgeejveffteduiedtkefhje ffueeuudelkedtueefleeiieehledvhfenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhg ihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpghhithhhuhgsuhhsvghrtghonhhtvghnthdrtghomhdpmhhnoh htrdhnvghtnecukfhppeduudelrddujedrudehkedrvdehudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:VO4pX5gvYHFaZLax5cfWmT-J8uca8qaD2W3JdZHRmbpzXEgPt4ypJw> <xmx:VO4pX-krN1jOHZoyqKFu6htkV6t81eMGAPiv4nvu_EB4Gzfnfd8ROA> <xmx:VO4pX1x0oO4vEOWO1tsd5FGxEUV5j0oj3VgOx50ES6HKOZIckSw_2A> <xmx:Ve4pXzIvl3sXQxdbmzK8KRdIAGHwLOXBAMVVeHoHvNZFFDr2Yw0mcw>
Received: from marks-air.mnot.net (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7C0D93280059; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 19:25:07 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <13607.1596542871@dooku>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:25:04 +1000
Cc: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <76EE620C-2E4B-4213-A82C-62FD2AFB1522@mnot.net>
References: <3f2d1790efb44ac39405a23dc592dd89@siemens.com> <13607.1596542871@dooku>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/LBXRRF7g3P2MTsMGXYzgPF8CmAY>
Subject: Re: [Anima] possible last minute changes to anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra (was Re: Handling of endpoint path names (from BRSKI-AE discussion today))
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 23:25:15 -0000


> On 4 Aug 2020, at 10:07 pm, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Mark, this concerns some desired changes to /.well-known/est.
> 
> Specifically, to move the things we did in anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra out
> of /.well-known/est into a new /.well-known/brski.
> The WG has not concluded to do this as yet, as the above document has passed
> IESG review and is in MISREF at the RFC-EDITOR.
> 
> The thread starts at:
>   https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/jjusQdqzS3G4WbczolCxF0_YmQQ/
> 
> I have prepared sample changes which I'd like your opinion on.
> 
> 1) I am now registering /.well-known/brski

Sure, we have a process for that ;)  Easiest thing to do is to create an issue here:
  https://github.com/protocol-registries/well-known-uris

> 2) I no longer need /.well-known/est to point to the new document.  Should I
>   say this?

Yes. Best thing to do is to include it in the request above.

> 3) Am I creating the /.well-known/brski Registry correctly?
>   I didn't see any other WK that have sub-registries.

How you manage the namespace under your well-known URI is totally up to you. That looks reasonable to me, although if you don't think it's likely there will be additions for a while, you could just say 'update this document to register additional paths'.

Cheers,


> 
> This URL works:
>  https://ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-41&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/brski-est-rename/dtbootstrap-anima-keyinfra.txt
> 
> But, includes a few small typos which were sent to the RFC-editor.
> 
> This should be the better DIFF:
>  https://ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-42&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/brski-est-rename/dtbootstrap-anima-keyinfra.txt
> 
> but the DT/cache refuses to believe -42 exists yet, but maybe in 30 minutes
> it will be okay.
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/