IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Use of the chartering tool for ANIMA - IPR

Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Sat, 13 September 2014 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8326F1A885D for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 05:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1aB5Zh_AqvfV for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 05:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A47B1A8857 for <anima@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 05:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BJJ35160; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:05:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:05:48 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.204]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 20:05:38 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Papadimitriou, Dimitri (Dimitri)" <dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.com>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] Use of the chartering tool for ANIMA - IPR
Thread-Index: AQHPzyShvddO1mWehkeTB+Nl1dU7BZv+9Tsv
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:05:38 +0000
Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AF2CAAE@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <54117DD5.3090303@cisco.com> <84675BAA8C49154AB81E2587BE8BDF832345311E@FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <5413136E.1060801@cisco.com> <84675BAA8C49154AB81E2587BE8BDF8323453C1A@FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <5413568B.5060801@gmail.com>,<5413F28A.4060206@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5413F28A.4060206@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.46.202.75]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/Od486OeSlieXZoU1ADeGpTXguQU
Cc: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Use of the chartering tool for ANIMA - IPR
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:05:52 -0000

Hi, Benoit,

I can confirm that I am aware of NO relevant IPR for all three drafts, so no IPR disclosure is needed from my side. I complied with the IPR rules defined in BCP78 and BCP79.

Regards,

Sheng
________________________________________
From: Anima [anima-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
Sent: 13 September 2014 15:30
To: Brian E Carpenter; Papadimitriou, Dimitri (Dimitri)
Cc: anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] Use of the chartering tool for ANIMA - IPR

Dear all,

>> Side question: as the IETF now asks for IPR related issues once adopting a document (from its charter), what would happen in case of any IPR application to the documents listed in the charter ? will you allow this group proposing its royalty free protocol ?
> IPR disclosure is required as soon as a contribution is posted -
> there is nothing special about WG adoption in that respect.
> Also, each WG makes its own decisions about whether any
> disclosed IPR is a problem or not; that's a consensus matter,
> not an AD choice.
Exactly.

I would like to draw to the attention of the
draft-jiang-config-negotiation-protocol,
draft-pritikin-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures, and
draft-behringer-autonomic-control-plane draft authors that IPR
declarations are required, and that IPRs might be an important factor in
a WG creation.
Actually, this message is valid for all draft authors.

Regards, Benoit
>
>     Brian
> .
>

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email