Re: [Anima] Use of the chartering tool for ANIMA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anima [mailto:anima-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise
> (bclaise)
> Sent: 13 September 2014 09:30
> To: Brian E Carpenter; Papadimitriou, Dimitri (Dimitri)
> Cc: anima@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Anima] Use of the chartering tool for ANIMA - IPR
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> >> Side question: as the IETF now asks for IPR related issues once adopting a
> document (from its charter), what would happen in case of any IPR
> application to the documents listed in the charter ? will you allow this group
> proposing its royalty free protocol ?
> > IPR disclosure is required as soon as a contribution is posted - there
> > is nothing special about WG adoption in that respect.
> > Also, each WG makes its own decisions about whether any disclosed IPR
> > is a problem or not; that's a consensus matter, not an AD choice.
> Exactly.
> 
> I would like to draw to the attention of the draft-jiang-config-negotiation-
> protocol,
> draft-pritikin-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures, and draft-behringer-
> autonomic-control-plane draft authors that IPR declarations are required,
> and that IPRs might be an important factor in a WG creation.
> Actually, this message is valid for all draft authors.
> 
> Regards, Benoit

Thanks for the reminder, Benoit. There is IPR on draft-behringer-autonomic-control-plane, and that is declared (see datatracker), as well as for draft-pritikin-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures, which we forgot to declare and are now in the process of doing so. (Background: This draft evolved from draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap, for which we DID declare the IPR, but we overlooked that for the new draft we need to declare again.). 

Michael

> >     Brian
> > .
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima