IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Use of the chartering tool for ANIMA

"Papadimitriou, Dimitri (Dimitri)" <dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 12 September 2014 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5261A0030 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ln5R_5a0py6l for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5951A000C for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 9F993428F0C80; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:40:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s8CKeFYo032283 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:40:15 +0200
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.52]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:40:15 +0200
From: "Papadimitriou, Dimitri (Dimitri)" <dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] Use of the chartering tool for ANIMA
Thread-Index: AQHPza3a1jkbMRoJYk+aCf9E+Yf6gJv9FXXQgABs0wCAAFGqEP///leAgAAh5hA=
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:40:12 +0000
Message-ID: <84675BAA8C49154AB81E2587BE8BDF8323453C9A@FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <54117DD5.3090303@cisco.com> <84675BAA8C49154AB81E2587BE8BDF832345311E@FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <5413136E.1060801@cisco.com> <84675BAA8C49154AB81E2587BE8BDF8323453C1A@FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <5413568B.5060801@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5413568B.5060801@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/_Fe49rDbnH2PFwwtGvM070smTx0
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Use of the chartering tool for ANIMA
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:40:19 -0000

Brian:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 10:25 PM
> To: Papadimitriou, Dimitri (Dimitri)
> Cc: Benoit Claise; anima@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Anima] Use of the chartering tool for ANIMA
> 
> Two clarifications:
> 
> On 13/09/2014 07:56, Papadimitriou, Dimitri (Dimitri) wrote:
> ...
> > Discovery as documented "draft-jiang-config-negotiation-protocol"
> > (listed in the charter)
> 
> No, we have removed it from the charter according to earlier discussions.
> (I'd be glad to respond to your specific comments on the draft, but that
> is not a chartering issue.)

In the latest version (as posted by Benoit <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/anima/current/msg00266.html>, I read:

[specific goals]
The goals of this working group are below. The were selected to according to the
analyzed technical gaps in draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis: 
o Definition of a discovery and negotiation protocol for autonomic functions
   Starting point: draft-jiang-config-negotiation-protocol 
o Definition of a solution to bootstrap a trust infrastructure 
   Starting point: draft-pritikin-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures 
o Definition of a solution for a separated Autonomic Control Plane
   Starting point: draft-behringer-autonomic-control-plane 

> > Side question: as the IETF now asks for IPR related issues once adopting
> a document (from its charter), what would happen in case of any IPR
> application to the documents listed in the charter ? will you allow this
> group proposing its royalty free protocol ?
> 
> IPR disclosure is required as soon as a contribution is posted - there is
> nothing special about WG adoption in that respect.

I don't understand then why my mailbox is full of emails from WG chairs asking for any IPR issue upon WG adoption. 

> Also, each WG makes its own decisions about whether any disclosed IPR is a
> problem or not; that's a consensus matter, not an AD choice.
>
>    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email