Re: [antitrust-policy] New Version Notification for draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08.txt

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 01 March 2024 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE65C14CE25 for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:10:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.804
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.804 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VPoVBqzDwGHY for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:10:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1529C14F6BB for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:10:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 421GAasf027179; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:10:36 GMT
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4341D4604F; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:10:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3724B4604B; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:10:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:10:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([148.252.146.144]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 421GAY28020560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:10:35 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Salz, Rich'" <rsalz@akamai.com>, 'Jay Daley' <jay@staff.ietf.org>
Cc: antitrust-policy@ietf.org, 'Lars Eggert' <lars@eggert.org>
References: <170924133688.22191.501196370379528149@ietfa.amsl.com> <1AE485F0-0DD8-4D0B-9581-1F3B2B3ABAA2@staff.ietf.org> <00f301da6bd3$6dfcb380$49f61a80$@olddog.co.uk> <1C8F88D0-F64B-4CCF-99F3-EE3CD181E6D3@staff.ietf.org> <013e01da6bec$9c086260$d4192720$@olddog.co.uk> <E8668CCA-E22F-4C5D-8100-80391F59C3F8@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8668CCA-E22F-4C5D-8100-80391F59C3F8@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 16:10:35 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <015b01da6bf2$ff3e1f90$fdba5eb0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHvVTvP6WSeW8tEKKzRZmxKX2vXkgIF0Fi7AdR7ZncC++ltTwLtBPQ0AZTbeZywnnrIwA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 148.252.146.144
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=LHZcREv9uG4xPRDwl3rHrl+DTVje0V95bgrbTsV7GKE=; b=t5h 6Emrw+Nh7YL4eTcFlK1/ELQU2TrC7XqIAJ+r9NQ0SvOwPZWRD3safBS8B6510BgT KGEzRHozIXLOLyIjdZ9e79g324ms11B2yEIrPFWbfh77QssV2XPg2XxGz7mfcpad P4GlqMWF9n3s9ILAH6sgtZI5p/KuTA+s7jx98T5IBfO/+UYwsKOXQ0h9ipN+wDGB StUyHznCBvj4qBht9uIBuBsFrxkMZQnEL7XA5v2j0UeNlgQdrEOSvE5wDd/IF1jn LDhGDHC1hPa4/c1WPE0WGHosUALd0ORCfmAS/kfhDCNA+ob4KXKrJa+j1Gp7ZKyB ma6Xg6JOWyJJaou3BHA==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28226.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--13.899-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--13.899-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28226.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--13.899300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: csPTYAMX1+HH1DfC+QNQxHFPUrVDm6jtVF5mUd6sIMYUsxngDoycC4V3 /OCw3Ja9ad3x2BkQDuL+w331TsHWu6/Elphzpf1LfOaYwP8dcX7E+Qmx+90OQ6q9wgXVNwtgZ+i SaSf4YpPcGUG8UKRr20ioj2M+ndA7sULgoWXJHpcdZEkR8Y/mea4/eOFqKcGqQm/bEuDKSM+jxY yRBa/qJQOkBnb8H8GWF8hs8W5tMc9q8/xv2Um1avoLR4+zsDTthUfR2rvBju7ANBSWfEiFedvj8 eG8qtxmtZ0PVQz3euIuajNqhPCfXD8fCYHxCbxO
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/antitrust-policy/RdWsHhWuEj0rEQd9cSRmyK9uJrw>
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] New Version Notification for draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08.txt
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/antitrust-policy/>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 16:10:57 -0000

"not"  :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> 
Sent: 01 March 2024 16:08
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; 'Jay Daley' <jay@staff.ietf.org>
Cc: antitrust-policy@ietf.org; 'Lars Eggert' <lars@eggert.org>
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] New Version Notification for draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08.txt

> Maybe it is just the prominence. I wrote my comment having read the Abstract, Introduction, and Section 2. I was starting on Section 3 when the thought occurred. 

How:
- Put "This is not legal advice" in the abstract
- Put "This is legal advice, see Section 4.2 for more information" in the Introduction