IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [antitrust-policy] New Version Notification for draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08.txt

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 01 March 2024 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586D9C151553 for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:10:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X1JJ3a2fRWbc for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052B2C14CE52 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:10:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 421G9vxF013459; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:09:57 GMT
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61FA4604D; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:09:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C8D4604C; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:09:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:09:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([148.252.146.144]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 421G9uEH019126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:09:57 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Jay Daley' <jay@staff.ietf.org>
Cc: antitrust-policy@ietf.org, 'Lars Eggert' <lars@eggert.org>
References: <170924133688.22191.501196370379528149@ietfa.amsl.com> <1AE485F0-0DD8-4D0B-9581-1F3B2B3ABAA2@staff.ietf.org> <00f301da6bd3$6dfcb380$49f61a80$@olddog.co.uk> <1C8F88D0-F64B-4CCF-99F3-EE3CD181E6D3@staff.ietf.org> <013e01da6bec$9c086260$d4192720$@olddog.co.uk> <ED981364-7087-47DF-AE83-539D4BA067E8@staff.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <ED981364-7087-47DF-AE83-539D4BA067E8@staff.ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 16:09:56 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <014f01da6bf2$e8469b50$b8d3d1f0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0150_01DA6BF2.E8469B50"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHvVTvP6WSeW8tEKKzRZmxKX2vXkgIF0Fi7AdR7ZncC++ltTwLtBPQ0AiNjVL2wmgSmoA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 148.252.146.144
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=20221128; bh=wHtwskWaNtZmbpm9SXnkA AwaGC3lAbq1I0cVvWTKjM0=; b=Tf24+suFkSFzL51guHxjXLDQVFlRYJfv8MUcs 4XIZ9cbFx4hLPFKlyr+WupG8xMgTkGtUuJJHBqVwdN5aPZ4DVjOtHJjU+gi0rIs0 AQwr29zVjrWuC3XwIdiC5D8cFtPkPzjaEXbW6AC54+JuQP7hGGq46G0VPoXTNObE 0djyMhjcwukKWOj6a9ojb4eBziiyOE4jZjXoksZlhTLe1fkA1MSgpDdYG1V5T1x4 AiPLus280HCvFdJPHPgwumHZc4cnQ6DBpVUSujkndUzfAEb5PAZE66fWnOPPFexA hPm+mg1BJhOty1PirBWg13baGsjIzBPyFjESqDdNHwplDXmwA==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28226.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--19.162-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--19.162-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28226.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--19.161500-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 0dFPYP4mu5TH1DfC+QNQxHFPUrVDm6jtC/ExpXrHizxeZ4crEsUj/X0h vKWZjh+0vnCllUJsUcvyWNJOB9s8ULgSigd+50baL8+mpRda1YN+S5m2/8VLmj+B/tp8itBTUCQ uDvGEd6PShWXE1SuogbSrlR5UKDXAQMdZN5DZqtc8xwCU4LSqsPioIsi7Sa0g6j9YR9MtpkJ/o7 4UQlCmAFW2/vqCq6UygVo1o+4QhtLHt8FegNoXIRxA1AKmVGTOCCo+lsDuynUDLr9vPVWwiMVA0 8S977kgXVsEWVqYqahmYaQ4XR/HzG/M6LH3OjWrYrc32n84WHp+kAcS0i53MM2JeYM8GzTZ9+do eRMj31AenMgsiRZrp/vvQp8p+3+4CkBHQ7k87pIZS5uxXPxN6S2VljVYB9GNrKfoyAyHv5mg5pC 87QfQFuLzNWBegCW21WdIO+NJS/lvsMcSUZ5eOUiq4co4LuihsOzOncrmCoOFR9Hau8GO7qfDnZ dVcKQkOLcoXrj66ZaY+RUhum8JXXcpxlm1CkWFxBkYe/Jx66JFz2vZmiGAZA==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/antitrust-policy/nuEBUFZQD8mFC3uXlKWTbvlrVEY>
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] New Version Notification for draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08.txt
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/antitrust-policy/>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 16:10:09 -0000

> On the earlier question of referencing the COIs and whistleblower service, I have

> conferred with colleagues who note that all the COI policies are easy to find on

> the web site, (except for one, which we are investigating), and that the

> whistleblower service is the first result when searching for " IETF whistleblower".

> Given that, there’s a strong preference not to have links in the RFC that need to

> be maintained, or for us to maintain a page at a stable link that then links to

> these COIs.  However, if you think the effort would be worth it then please let me know.

 

I guess I am lazy. Well, that’s what my third grade report card said.

 

I went to www.ietf.org <http://www.ietf.org>  and searched for “whistle”. 

“No results found”

Turns out I should have searched for “whistleblower”.

Sigh.

 

On the LLC page (https://www.ietf.org/about/administration/overview/) you have to guess that this is under “Policies and procedures”. 

Maybe not such a hard guess.

 

Anyway, not a biggie.

Leave as is or add “which can be found on the IETF web site”

 

A

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email