[apps-discuss] Webfinger: acct "link relation"

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Wed, 14 March 2012 05:56 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C4621F85D3 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ST+fMR9NaL7N for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72DE21F85D1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sydney (rrcs-98-101-148-48.midsouth.biz.rr.com [98.101.148.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2E5ucqa026953 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:56:38 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1331704598; bh=AVI6du+Zel6XM7nuGZbQxZ3MYwwuNQVmT3WAj1V45gs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fi6Usk+b8yn2NUvqNkyqp7Ria+yELKAbb3o75fgj2OmdJ0ZZnXSf4H88k/alngKgy 5rBAXFTYW5vjUPWEWbRwV9i+0ETrlowOKcGg6eIH5AlLok/KKi/2d9Qvk1xYiLtFUW Tj3qMFSH0elm17N5xUqlFk0V093qTpasY1WFSPC0=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, webfinger@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:56:44 -0400
Message-ID: <05d001cd01a7$3cbb0c70$b6312550$@packetizer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_05D1_01CD0185.B5A96C70"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac0BpQFPzAZiU0kpTmqy3YhO+8RyEw==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: [apps-discuss] Webfinger: acct "link relation"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:56:41 -0000

Folks,

 

In the latest Webfinger draft, we introduced a "acct" link relation named
"acct" (see Section 6).  The intent with that link relation was to allow for
one to inform a webfinger client that a user's account information may be
retrieved elsewhere.  I believe this will be important, since a user might
have more than one account and this might serve as a means of associating
them.  Certainly, it would be a way of retrieving information from those
other accounts automatically.

 

Perhaps calling the new link relation "acct" is too restrictive, though.  If
one used Webfinger to query other kinds of information other than a user's
account, there may still be a need/desire to refer the Webfinger client to
other resources.

 

What do you think about changing this section such that the link relation is
renamed to "seealso"?  This would still be useful when querying an acct URI,
but would also be useful when querying any URI since it  is more generic.

 

Do note that "seealso" would be different than the "alternate" link
relation.  It would not refer to alternative information, but would refer to
supplemental information.  In practice, the supplemental information may be
the more informative since the bulk of the information related to a user
might be held under a different account.

 

Your thoughts?

 

Paul