[apps-discuss] 回复: Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25

["Jiankang Yao" <[e-mail]>]

thanks for your kind reply.
Your suggested change is one way to improve this document.
but I suggest you to ask more internationalization experts' comments about this internationalization issue in the apps-discuss list.

Regards



Jiankang Yao

From: Haynes, Tom
Date: 2013-05-08 12:23
To: Jiankang YAO
CC: ; 
Subject: Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25
Hi  Jiankang,

I spoke with our internationalization expert and they describe that our use of
stringprep is informative and as a guideline.

As such, we will move the reference to no longer be normative and thus
keep the document to refer to the existing version of UNICODE.

Thanks,
Tom

On Apr 12, 2013, at 12:57 AM, Jiankang YAO <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer 
> for this draft (for background on appsdir, please 
> see 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate 
> ).  
> Please resolve these comments along with any other comments 
> you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document 
> shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: 
> draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-25 
> Title: 
> Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol
> 
> 
> Reviewer: Jiankang Yao
> Review Date: April 12, 2013
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This draft is very long. I mainly focus on section 12 of this document.This part is about internationalization.
> 
> Major issue:none.
> 
> Minor issue:
> 
>  This part refer to ISO.10646-1.1993, which is almost same to UNICODE 3.2. The RFC3454 referred by this document is also based on ISO.10646-1.1993. The problem is that the UNICODE has been updated to Version 6.2 from version 3.2. RFC3454 may not work for UNICODE 6.2.
>  Should this document be updated to refer to the new version of UNICODE?
> 
> 
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Jiankang Yao