IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Use of RFC 2119, Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-03.txt

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 28 March 2012 08:58 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45AC21F899D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.209, BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjVdNNBFrQ5I for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (cl-125.lon-03.gb.sixxs.net [IPv6:2a00:14f0:e000:7c::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D020121F899B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1332925115; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=wTwiU8Ji8ryQys40AfsJtB50zjZkKjoHGSXq/Pbpt84=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=gyzIsn25MhZIKDkMhWL6c16DXuegm9XA+y2EGYYcdp3cXsq1lhnpDHfJvaSflIsz+zXxgZ fKe2FQNFJsqx8BZxa9TNKxKDBZgMs0soqrOJIo9RMxP7X3d+Sle9RgusN/q4pubCSl8xaL qfjPV8zS6me+3dnV86JUH2+/TCqG+zo=;
Received: from [130.129.23.230] (dhcp-17e6.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.23.230]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <T3LSugAikn6o@rufus.isode.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:58:34 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
Message-ID: <4F72D2C0.2040604@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:58:40 +0200
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <503575970.11554@cnnic.cn> <4A10020DB6464A0BBA535BF75D21A9D9@LENOVO47E041CF> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928094CEB@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAC4RtVB9vbCoHN5wwgRkVc6Yhkp7ERQKgpMeHp93HGMqYpiAQQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F6978D8.10605@gmx.de> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06A902E82B@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <CALaySJ+2ULmwhpuA211ZJbZJHLWaT_BC7J0wpYtPc_uJWZY18A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+2ULmwhpuA211ZJbZJHLWaT_BC7J0wpYtPc_uJWZY18A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070005080904070700040809"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Use of RFC 2119, Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-03.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:58:37 -0000

On 28/03/2012 10:54, Barry Leiba wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com 
> <mailto:masinter@adobe.com>> wrote:
  [...]
> > Is a FCFS policy by itself consistent with having MUST and SHOULD 
> requirements
> > on the registration?
>
> Sure; we're starting with FCFS (as in BCP 26), and then adding 
> requirements.  Perfectly fine.
I think the question is who is going to enforce RFC 2119 language.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email