IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Use of RFC 2119, Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-03.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 28 March 2012 08:54 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CDF21F895F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.776
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.776 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.255, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdBeW-W-GUzf for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A9421F895E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbtb4 with SMTP id tb4so1235417obb.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KaJEWzSzhhEAnDAy7DKiBTlOxDH1y9SK+VHK9hP6shw=; b=QGyOlZCWEwTh5bUTanj8en/zig4OyphXHigcmAz0+hfz04w56sqs0JLCOvoxicRA1W aTkrwZ35dWz5oAzxtIAX7Vz2N40PsIxGCt+iAjicIGU+xcBT6k5Cb52Adt+KwWiDBmVu eG6HH+46caXPGgMHEr4ZetPFheMIyxRPwgyCofUuadcV8lF8orweEvhwx91eK/ubJ4q3 xKNMzkAgvtrEQcYxLkhXy4pL1EuE5f3CZyqQlBkAMbq8OfHXg3uBMoSjC4ydBjbUTStk YKhSp+GwNSgpDMQK6fpqZ5IbjgqKPK8wW85draJzppyptVaDj+eL+kCK3y6jXWh6zDS8 WOUA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.154.7 with SMTP id vk7mr3078125obb.22.1332924865628; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.60.10.68 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06A902E82B@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
References: <503575970.11554@cnnic.cn> <4A10020DB6464A0BBA535BF75D21A9D9@LENOVO47E041CF> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928094CEB@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAC4RtVB9vbCoHN5wwgRkVc6Yhkp7ERQKgpMeHp93HGMqYpiAQQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F6978D8.10605@gmx.de> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06A902E82B@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:54:25 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: yeY4TOOxPCXKxyFkCFjj5TgRWGU
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+2ULmwhpuA211ZJbZJHLWaT_BC7J0wpYtPc_uJWZY18A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04479fdd20c8b904bc49c1b1"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Use of RFC 2119, Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-03.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:54:27 -0000

On Wednesday, March 28, 2012, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote:
> rfc4395 and http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-4395bis-irireg-04both use 2119
> keywords in the same way:

Nevertheless, we've come to the decision to change it to lower-case words
here.

> Is a FCFS policy by itself consistent with having MUST and SHOULD
requirements
> on the registration?

Sure; we're starting with FCFS (as in BCP 26), and then adding
requirements.  Perfectly fine.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email