Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 10 December 2010 18:50 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8A628C0F8 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:50:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.637
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.637 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OYUtzw2fDa+t for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:50:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6042F28C0E6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:50:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] ((unknown) [109.73.6.25]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TQJ20wAbxVUI@rufus.isode.com>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:52:06 +0000
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS
Message-ID: <4D0276CC.70109@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:51:56 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <4D014724.5020009@stpeter.im> <491935898.11016@cnnic.cn> <491945917.26303@cnnic.cn>
In-Reply-To: <491945917.26303@cnnic.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:50:37 -0000
Jiankang YAO wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "SM" <sm@resistor.net> >To: <apps-discuss@ietf.org> >Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 7:03 AM >Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes > > >>At 13:16 09-12-10, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> >> >>>Your lazy Area Directors have finally posted minutes for the AppsArea >>>session at IETF79: >>> >>>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/minutes/apparea.txt >>> >>> >>Thanks LADs. >> >> "Barry mentions the three drafts already suggested: >> draft-nottingham-http-portal, Patrik Faltstrom's IDNAbis >> I-D (already discussed), and draft-merrit-jms-uri." >> >>Is APPSAWG taking on draft-merrit-jms-uri as a work item? >> >> >I think that it is suggestion or proposal. >yes, if APPSAWG has the consensus to do it. > > After hearing the discussion about draft-merrit-jms-uri in Beijing I decided to progress it as an individual submission. However I would still appreciate more reviews of it.
- [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes Jiankang YAO
- Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes Eric Johnson