IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes

"Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Fri, 10 December 2010 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8527728C11B for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:50:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <gl+hBROjJ6fT>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Duplicate header field: "Message-ID"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.766, BAYES_50=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gl+hBROjJ6fT for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A3B03A6BFD for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (eyou send program); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:51:57 +0800
Message-ID: <491945917.26303@cnnic.cn>
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: yaojk@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown (HELO lenovo47e041cf) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:51:57 +0800
Message-ID: <A7AB9910F3784693A5687F1647566CA5@LENOVO47E041CF>
From: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <4D014724.5020009@stpeter.im> <491935898.11016@cnnic.cn>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:50:10 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:50:30 -0000

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "SM" <sm@resistor.net>
To: <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes


> At 13:16 09-12-10, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>Your lazy Area Directors have finally posted minutes for the AppsArea
>>session at IETF79:
>>
>>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/minutes/apparea.txt
> 
> Thanks LADs.
> 
>   "Barry mentions the three drafts already suggested:
>    draft-nottingham-http-portal, Patrik Faltstrom's IDNAbis
>    I-D (already discussed), and draft-merrit-jms-uri."
> 
> Is APPSAWG taking on draft-merrit-jms-uri as a work item?
> 

I think that it is suggestion or proposal.
yes, if  APPSAWG has the consensus to do it.

Jiankang Yao

> Regards,
> -sm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email