IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes

Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> Fri, 10 December 2010 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <eric@tibco.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D9528C11E for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:05:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id suBSxAZJfu9E for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1-app.tibco.com (mx1-app.tibco.com [63.100.100.142]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C137428C10D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:05:12 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,325,1288594800"; d="scan'208";a="19107982"
Received: from tibco-5.tibco.com (HELO na-pa-fe01.na.tibco.com) ([63.100.100.5]) by mx1-app.tibco.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2010 11:06:30 -0800
Received: from Eric-Johnsons-MacBook-Pro.local ([10.105.178.20]) by na-pa-fe01.na.tibco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:06:29 -0800
Message-ID: <4D027A34.2010507@tibco.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:06:28 -0800
From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <4D014724.5020009@stpeter.im> <6.2.5.6.2.20101209150042.0c0a5bf0@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20101209150042.0c0a5bf0@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2010 19:06:29.0232 (UTC) FILETIME=[59B20F00:01CB989D]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-6.500.1024-17820.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--19.327300-8.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:05:14 -0000

Hi,

Just a small correction - I think you're referring below to

draft-merrick-jms-uri

(not merrit)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merrick-jms-uri/

-Eric.

On 12/9/10 3:03 PM, SM wrote:
> At 13:16 09-12-10, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Your lazy Area Directors have finally posted minutes for the AppsArea
>> session at IETF79:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/minutes/apparea.txt
>
> Thanks LADs.
>
>   "Barry mentions the three drafts already suggested:
>    draft-nottingham-http-portal, Patrik Faltstrom's IDNAbis
>    I-D (already discussed), and draft-merrit-jms-uri."
>
> Is APPSAWG taking on draft-merrit-jms-uri as a work item?
>
> Regards,
> -sm
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email