IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 09 December 2010 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8B828C152 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:03:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.463
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G75aXE72YnB9 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:03:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7766B28C144 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:03:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.5.Alpha0/8.14.5.Alpha0) with ESMTP id oB9N3mFY011168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:04:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1291935888; x=1292022288; bh=8CdyFyEEiIrQXQYO1S/CDL0ZUEV0pNvhWqKx756qCHo=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=BPA7OJUVHf2oUexbfmJz3Oio8e7eZhq13tONcYVMi7EEkGSdtafWfV6JGVakzVwuS crCe+sOAsI/ZZ3CIlto+lx7YCIZm9YhtoaOl2p1i2YNExcdtkCJcdqatc+QgD2Rmfz Lgv8vg6NZG946GV8bfLW4LyE1NpbxBmafKP6erCk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1291935888; x=1292022288; bh=8CdyFyEEiIrQXQYO1S/CDL0ZUEV0pNvhWqKx756qCHo=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=VMzZ8wYdLismMzJEePuVHqxVsK6+4Z/FOpILaOwSpRjqjjtA+FsQP42glGtw0uEKa vcc77iTCIN+yyxvsduO9ejKZAqoOe9/YbOg9H+RsNXxuXAfmURjPMd1a9/ZB/2ZBLR fTPnmvJckH1ft/33bCfojf44wh2ya+394O7zc1VA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=QHLtWoUqEamXXrgijfBEALYtkJj5ReRv1h32P6zKIdKaT6fEdHsm1h0UEJwttCYh0 KDDmRGsVxiKXizU9f9ZUbl51knuk1aeyGfGoErkGZm47g7tK3FEMOwapoEPt7XmzNHf dMT0UyRj0ENQhzW3a2SsO1+WNkrT2DhnozNWfaM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20101209150042.0c0a5bf0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:03:28 -0800
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D014724.5020009@stpeter.im>
References: <4D014724.5020009@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:03:23 -0000

At 13:16 09-12-10, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>Your lazy Area Directors have finally posted minutes for the AppsArea
>session at IETF79:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/minutes/apparea.txt

Thanks LADs.

   "Barry mentions the three drafts already suggested:
    draft-nottingham-http-portal, Patrik Faltstrom's IDNAbis
    I-D (already discussed), and draft-merrit-jms-uri."

Is APPSAWG taking on draft-merrit-jms-uri as a work item?

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email