IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Provisional URI registrations

"Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)" <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Thu, 25 November 2010 02:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lyndon@gandalf.orthanc.ca>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3811F3A69DD; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:48:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Edv1JwCQjlVx; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:48:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orthanc.ca (ve6bbm-1-pt.tunnel.tserv13.ash1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:7:139::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693503A6984; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:48:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orthanc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orthanc.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAP2nMaN064090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:49:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lyndon@gandalf.orthanc.ca)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by orthanc.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with UUCP id oAP2nMx0064089; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:49:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lyndon@gandalf.orthanc.ca)
Received: from gandalf.orthanc.ca (frodo.orthanc.ca [172.16.0.3]) by legolas.orthanc.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAP2nJKr069701; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:49:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lyndon@gandalf.orthanc.ca)
Message-ID: <2748668134b693184bc26f5331ea1284@gandalf.orthanc.ca>
To: ah@TR-Sys.de
From: "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)" <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:49:18 -0800
In-Reply-To: <201011222034.VAA22485@TR-Sys.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Provisional URI registrations
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 02:48:26 -0000

> I would not have challenged "tn3270" as a provisional URI scheme
> if there had been evidence that the procedures of RFC 4395 for such
> scheme had been followed.

'tn3270:' usage predates RFC 4395 by at least a decade.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email