Re: [apps-discuss] CONTEXTJ in TLD DNS-Labels (draft-liman-tld-names-05)

Patrik Fältström <patrik@frobbit.se> Tue, 19 July 2011 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <patrik@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A65B11E807F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yd4iF2AP7D8p for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv01.frobbit.se (srv01.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E9111E807A for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srv01.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF4C1185CD7C; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:04:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at frobbit.se
Received: from srv01.frobbit.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv01.frobbit.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F3YzWG8GRfBn; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:04:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::14] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::14]) (Authenticated sender: paf01) by srv01.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF791185BF34; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:26:49 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <patrik@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <8159C20D-BF2B-42CB-9529-C870A2AD1572@vpnc.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:26:48 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7E5E31E-89E7-46AF-9FA8-6CFD8F661376@frobbit.se>
References: <B464B2C6607E04FD0572AA74@192.168.1.128> <CANp6Ttw4MaAJy2VRvZ8929oBju9jL3b69PkSyFLi-SC4YaNTnw@mail.gmail.com> <5AC1318B-A219-4056-BD14-C90BEE85669E@frobbit.se> <8159C20D-BF2B-42CB-9529-C870A2AD1572@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: apps-discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] CONTEXTJ in TLD DNS-Labels (draft-liman-tld-names-05)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:04:17 -0000

On 19 jul 2011, at 16.55, Paul Hoffman wrote:

>> So the burden of convincing the community is on the ones that do think a character like ZWNJ is to be allowed or not that the need for the character is greater than the potential harm in _any_ context it might be used in.
> 
> I am going to push back here, hard. The draft is about names used in exactly one zone, and that zone has exactly one administrator. Your statement about "_any_ context" is inappropriate for this draft.

We just misunderstand each other.

Yes, this is about only this zone, so what I meant with "_any_ context" was still "within this single, very special zone".

So not really "_any_".

But, as John wrote, together with any character, regardless of language, etc...that was what I intended to mean by "_any_ context".

Still in THIS zone, the root zone.

   Patrik