IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review of draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-05

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Wed, 14 December 2011 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A9221F8AF7; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:54:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.793
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.793 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.194, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qyaSwsDpeqyY; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:54:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from VA3EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (va3ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9368921F8AF5; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:54:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail99-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.237) by VA3EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.7.40.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:54:12 +0000
Received: from mail99-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail99-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D053600E8; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:54:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -9
X-BigFish: VS-9(zz1432N98dKzz1202hzzz2fh2a8h668h839h93fh61h)
X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received-SPF: pass (mail99-va3: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=dthaler@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail99-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail99-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 132387805316191_14410; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:54:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS036.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.254]) by mail99-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04B3540046; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:54:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by VA3EHSMHS036.bigfish.com (10.7.99.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:54:10 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.39) by TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.80.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.5; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:54:08 -0800
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.4.253]) by TK5EX14MLTW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.39]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.003; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:54:07 -0800
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Apps Area Review of draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-05
Thread-Index: AQHMucMkQoH4GBQUTkOfLwmPiFsIPZXb+t6A//+CW0A=
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:54:07 +0000
Message-ID: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B34E533@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <4EE79606.30704@cisco.com> <4EE8BF1F.9080901@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4EE8BF1F.9080901@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:03:43 -0800
Cc: "draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org>, 'IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review of draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-05
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:54:13 -0000

Simon Perreault wrote:
> >   * Req1: Whither SCTP?  At the very least someone should say something
> about why
> >     SCTP is NOT on the list.
> 
> There are BEHAVE RFCs we can cite regarding NAT behaviour for TCP, UDP,
> and ICMP.
> There is none for SCTP. If there was one we could debate this. But right now
> it's just impossible to say "support SCTP" without saying how this is done.

I think Eliot was suggesting something like saying
"Note that SCTP is not in this list because there is no RFC at this time on
NAT behavior for SCTP."

-Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email