IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 15 November 2011 02:58 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59FD1F0D62 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:58:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.982
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.982 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.217, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aoEmLb2u+A2b for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9F01F0C8F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 53139 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2011 02:58:09 -0000
Received: from gal.iecc.com (64.57.183.53) by mail2.iecc.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2011 02:58:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 51444 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2011 02:58:09 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 15 Nov 2011 02:58:09 -0000
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:57:46 -0000
Message-ID: <20111115025746.26808.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20111114142451.09b74390@elandnews.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: sm+ietf@elandsys.com
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:58:11 -0000

Looks mostly reasonable.

In step (9), you say "If a transient failure condition is reported,
try the next MX RR" which looks wrong to me.  If you get a 4xx, you
requeue the message and try it again later.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email