IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 15 November 2011 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265B411E809C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:25:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7CcOumjx0CGn for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:25:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.152]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178DD11E8090 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:25:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:56679) by ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1RQOdQ-0001ii-Fh (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:25:32 +0000
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1RQOdQ-0005Dg-R9 (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:25:32 +0000
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:25:32 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHhFybr3OyhE310J8-iYGsY4h4Y=QaLisaFd761L64_w4_CcJw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1111151925030.30178@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20111115025746.26808.qmail@joyce.lan> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1111151057160.5322@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1111151903240.41620@joyce.lan> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1111151108140.30178@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAHhFybr3OyhE310J8-iYGsY4h4Y=QaLisaFd761L64_w4_CcJw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:25:38 -0000

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It would be nice to have both, an official STD 10 fresher than 821,
> and an informational companion obsoleting 3974 with the dual stack
> example.

WRT sual stack, what is missing from section 5 of RFC 5321?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Viking, North Utsire, South Utsire, Forties, Cromarty: Southerly or
southeasterly 4 or 5, occasionally 6 in Cromarty. Slight or moderate.
Occasional drizzle. Moderate or good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email