Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC for draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 10 April 2012 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FDA21F8595 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.935, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c1R1CcRaQdEk for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C26B21F8582 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2012 13:38:47 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 10 Apr 2012 15:38:47 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19YlON/MlJYxCZRW0sdJgr1ickRD8a9Gf4bWhf7Ow +Y4nCtl6+XpkWN
Message-ID: <4F8437E7.1070501@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:38:47 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280C9874@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <01OE2UNN2HJ000ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <4F82B5F6.3050806@gmx.de> <01OE3UQGECV600ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <4F843332.7060705@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F843332.7060705@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC for draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:38:49 -0000

On 2012-04-10 15:18, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> ...
>> Not sure I see any need for a normative reference though.
>
> (I've mentioned my opinion to Julian, but I would like to state it for
> the record.)
> I think an update to RFC 2616 should have a reference to
> draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset and make it clear that the
> previous default was removed. An Informative reference to
> draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset should be fine.

HTTPbis *does* make it clear that the default (overriding the base spec) 
was removed.

What's not clear to me is why it would need to reference 
draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset.

Best regards, Julian