Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC for draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Mon, 09 April 2012 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565C121F8724 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 07:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.520, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UKRyzGIEDke8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 07:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D693221F8723 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 07:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OE3UWFQ1F400P50M@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 07:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OE0NBOM18G00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 07:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01OE3UQGECV600ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:12:06 +0200" <4F82B5F6.3050806@gmx.de>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280C9874@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <01OE2UNN2HJ000ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <4F82B5F6.3050806@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC for draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:34:30 -0000

> On 2012-04-08 23:08, Ned Freed wrote:
> >> This message starts Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset.  Please review the document and provide comments to the list, the co-chairs, or the authors by Friday, April 20th.
> >
> >> The datatracker link is https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset/.
> >
> >> -MSK, APPSAWG co-chair
> >
> > I just reviewed this document and it's looking good to me.
> >
> > You'll probably want to remove the anchor2 bit at the end of the WGLC.

> Of course.

> I'm also not totally convinced that HTTPbis actually needs to reference
> this document at all; any opinions on this?

Really ard to say without knowing how they deal with the iso-8859-1. I can see
it being done in a way that doesn't need a reference. Or it could be done in a
way where a reference would be helpful.

Not sure I see any need for a normative reference though.

				Ned

> > There also one very minor typo:
> >
> > OLD: "including absence of any default."
> > NEW: "including the absence of any default."

> Done.

> Best regards, Julian