exposing sensitive information in URIs - LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 21 January 2010 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E074E3A680D for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:23:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.485, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QgHOSQQtK+X8 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BED0E3A6774 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:23:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2010 14:23:10 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.105]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 21 Jan 2010 15:23:10 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+F1ohzBaaFUusGGPixPnQWfyBR9YnhxH4TOw2WWj ZKEXRQzsKlQOS1
Message-ID: <4B586349.5050405@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:23:05 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: exposing sensitive information in URIs - LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt
References: <20100119053002.5CD613A683B@core3.amsl.com> <E4FF7733-D744-4AC3-AB99-66A12868E4CE@mnot.net> <4B56E27D.800@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4B56E27D.800@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.67000000000000004
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:23:18 -0000

Hi,

finally a security related comment.

During IETF LC for draft-brown-versioning-link-relations we got a 
comment from Eric Rescorla:

"In general this mechanism seems sound but I'm not sure that the 
security considerations are entirely adequate. This mechanism lets you 
learn information about other versions of a resource even if you 
potentially don't have permission to view them directly. Consider a 
limiting case where each version of the resource had a name that 
contained the change set for that resource. E.g.,

http://example.com/versions/filename/_@line_50_+_FOO;@line_60_+_BAR/;

In this case, seeing other parts of the version tree leaks information 
about those versions. I don't think that this is a problem for the 
draft, but it might be useful to mention that this feature has 
implications for name construction."

I assume this is a concern that applies to the Link header in general.

Best regards, Julian