IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 04 February 2010 05:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEEB3A67A5 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:31:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.288, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6IZLnCA+r9F for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:31:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B20C3A62C1 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:31:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.26.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF7C422E1F3; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:31:55 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B585EFF.2080104@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:31:50 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <7885A4CC-0040-45FD-9749-2204DA072845@mnot.net>
References: <20100119053002.5CD613A683B@core3.amsl.com> <E4FF7733-D744-4AC3-AB99-66A12868E4CE@mnot.net> <4B56E27D.800@gmx.de> <4B585EFF.2080104@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:31:19 -0000

On 22/01/2010, at 1:04 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Section 9.1., paragraph 9:
> OLD:
> 
>   [RFC4646]  Phillips, A. and M. Davis, "Tags for Identifying
>              Languages", RFC 4646, September 2006.
> 
> NEW:
> 
>   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
>              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
>              May 2008.

Did you mean to replace 4646 with 5646 here?

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email