IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts

Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com> Fri, 19 September 2014 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <g.white@CableLabs.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9C01A06E4 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.416
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.416 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WRSwMzP5zv9m for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ondar.cablelabs.com (ondar.cablelabs.com [192.160.73.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D7A1A06C6 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kyzyl.cablelabs.com (kyzyl [10.253.0.7]) by ondar.cablelabs.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8JKIWFm031598; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:18:32 -0600
Received: from exchange.cablelabs.com (10.5.0.19) by kyzyl.cablelabs.com (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/407/kyzyl.cablelabs.com); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:18:32 -0600 (MDT)
X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/407/kyzyl.cablelabs.com)
Received: from EXCHANGE.cablelabs.com ([::1]) by EXCHANGE.cablelabs.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:18:32 -0600
From: Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts
Thread-Index: AQHP0bOVmCA4fSjuq0imIzHnYfjFUJwELcwAgANtwwCAAU7MgA==
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:18:32 +0000
Message-ID: <D041EA48.3D475%g.white@cablelabs.com>
References: <54183D58.3090503@mti-systems.com> <CAA93jw7O_jCEGfZoZEqJCMS9A+SfC2d2OO+SqTJxG_P+aJcRYg@mail.gmail.com> <61041020-F1D4-4300-8D90-0BF5173CAB1A@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <61041020-F1D4-4300-8D90-0BF5173CAB1A@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
x-originating-ip: [10.4.11.31]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <A696A624DC4B9B4D94FC99E6BDC1F3C1@cablelabs.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/DllxycbTVa-xdNpD3TcZcqX7Xxs
Cc: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:18:42 -0000

Fred,

I know you, Rong and Bill VS have seen it, but in case others haven't,
there is an apples-to-apples comparison of fq-codel and fq-pie in my paper
from May (along with some design notes, since the merge of fq and pie is
not as straightforward as one might think).

http://www.cablelabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/DOCSIS-AQM_May2014.pdf

Best Regards,
Greg




On 9/18/14, 12:20 PM, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

>
>On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:58 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If a fq_pie were produced, how would that work?
>
>We are doing an fq_pie implementation, at least as a prototype. It merges
>the fq part of your existing fq_codel code RP¹s PIE algorithm. There is a
>part of me that would want to revisit the design of fq to make it a
>calendar queue, but that is down the road. What we¹re interested in right
>now is an apples/apples comparison with fq_codel. Further reports when
>we¹re ready to report, which isn¹t yet.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email