IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 18 September 2014 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2F01A8892 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -116.153
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-116.153 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x5h_uWgCpfMK for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5FE1A888E for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1173; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1411064201; x=1412273801; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=B1kvOtkVTtzCXlNPU4vzKQf0ir6wfZeqdsRazthFlyg=; b=TaC3O7n8GKHKrFdSHxT1skgZ/7osF/PPfpfF5ooFU00lgezcaAzwUTV4 n/leFH1KWnHEqzG+EjZXOEXFFNKNSXS++8ykh0NcMx3eqzVBbtGLyFZ33 R15VM9tKQfQssh+GCiFjtjfgeYtUbpRVC9E9cZ/mUofs6tm5JQoPtoMuf Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwFAH4gG1StJA2J/2dsb2JhbABggw1TVwTJR4dNAYELFgF5hAQBAQMBeQULAgEIDjgyJQIEDgUOiCgIDcIrARePdweDLoEdBZFOggiBS2SHB4Fgk2iDXmyBSIECAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,548,1406592000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="353250239"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2014 18:16:41 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8IIGeu0020028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:16:40 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.15]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([fe80::200:5efe:173.37.183.34%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:16:40 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts
Thread-Index: AQHP02ywUhr7rSrezkmuB1kbjo2JQg==
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:16:39 +0000
Message-ID: <F29EFE7C-FEAB-4FA1-8E28-018B1A624DBB@cisco.com>
References: <54183D58.3090503@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <54183D58.3090503@mti-systems.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.154.176.158]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EC8FA608-E93F-423F-9B89-281B90C1490C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/_XAdUnEPbIxiX9U2KBHmjhwEKLI
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:17:21 -0000

On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:38 AM, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:

> We would like feedback right now on adopting:
> 1 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-01
> and
> 2 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-02
> 
> towards the charter milestone for submitting algorithm
> specifications to the IESG. 

Personally, I think submitting those two as PS makes sense. No comment on the others in the list; I could imagine some of them eventually.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email