[aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Tue, 16 September 2014 13:38 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EE51A0704 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EbpRvr8ejwtY for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob17.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob17.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.110]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFE11A06FC for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.210]) by atl4mhob17.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8GDcsmh023307 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:38:54 -0400
Received: (qmail 30898 invoked by uid 0); 16 Sep 2014 13:38:54 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 69.81.143.143
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.108?) (wes@mti-systems.com@69.81.143.143) by 0 with ESMTPA; 16 Sep 2014 13:38:54 -0000
Message-ID: <54183D58.3090503@mti-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:38:32 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/iaw4hRx2ioCQmBBClP5TYWNbpXc
Subject: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:39:00 -0000
On the mailing list, on the summer webex, and during the last meeting, we've discussed plans and expectations for adopting algorithm specifications as working group drafts. For a process description, see page 6 of: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-aqm-0.pdf (one exception is that our charter says algorithms can be Proposed Standard, and we must have forgot that when drawing the chart) Here is the list of algorithm documents and how we view their current status (alphabetical order): - draft-hoeiland-joergensen-aqm-fq-codel : this has cleared "Gate-1", and is welcome for continued discussion, but is heavily focused on the FQ / scheduling aspect, and relies on CoDel as an AQM. It could become an appendix to the CoDel draft, or proceed some other way. Feedback about how folks want to handle this is very welcome. - draft-lauten-aqm-gsp : this has cleared "Gate-1" and is welcome for continued discussion, but we haven't yet seen the interest from multiple parties towards progressing it - draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel : this is ready for the "Gate-2" decision about WG adoption. We have some significant concerns about whether editors are available to handle this through the working group, however. - draft-pan-aqm-pie : this is ready for the "Gate-2" decision about WG adoption. - draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie : this could either become an appendix to the draft-pan specification or could progress in parallel to it as an Informational description of what has been done, and shouldn't require much additional work. We would like feedback right now on adopting: 1 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-01 and 2 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-02 towards the charter milestone for submitting algorithm specifications to the IESG. Whether they are Proposed Standard or Experimental can be debated now or later, but we want to probe if there's critical mass to adopt them first. -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Wesley Eddy
- [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Wesley Eddy
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Dave Taht
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Dave Taht
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Greg White
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Rong Pan (ropan)
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Michael Welzl
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Greg White
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Dave Taht
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [aqm] adoption call: algorithm drafts Greg White