Re: [arch-d] I-D Action: draft-iab-protocol-maintenance-04.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 06 November 2019 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6136120100 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:46:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bzoMSjjazeEH for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D0F9120145 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.102] (p548DC893.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.200.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 477g8Y3T4bzyRf; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 22:46:21 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8A3AAC7A4@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 22:46:21 +0100
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 594769579.3696049-3c98ed31c9345182d0f9102e17ee8a1e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2D4229AF-0217-4E8F-AD2B-C7D41DF98BA5@tzi.org>
References: <157284936054.13440.20144182660413459@ietfa.amsl.com> <d6c4e7b7-1a43-7859-427a-35ebf1343fcf@gmail.com> <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8A3AAC7A4@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/O4kR9nFHu21qFfl5tB9wNJWmMAA>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] I-D Action: draft-iab-protocol-maintenance-04.txt
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 21:46:26 -0000

On Nov 6, 2019, at 22:14, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <db3546@att.com> wrote:
> 
> But to say "the robustness principle is harmful"

(I apologize if I sound like a broken record:)

“Common misunderstandings of the robustness principle are harmful”

Or misapplications.  As with all principles, the robustness principle has its proper domain.
And we now know more about the harmful effects of misapplying it than we did in 1983.

Grüße, Carsten